IBJNews

Charter Homes owner gets 2-plus years for mortgage fraud

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Charter Homes owner Jerry J. Jaquess has been sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison and ordered to pay restitution of $825,000 for his role in a $20 million mortgage fraud scheme.

Jaquess, 67, pleaded guilty to one count each of wire fraud and money laundering. Chief Judge David F. Hamilton issued the sentence Tuesday in Indianapolis.

After 30 months in prison, he will serve another three years on supervised release. The restitution will go to Homecomings Financial and Argent Mortgage Co., two of the victims.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Indiana in April charged Jaquess and six others with crimes connected with 149 fraudulent loan transactions totaling $19.7 million between 2003 and 2005.

The charges followed an investigation by special agents of the IRS Criminal Investigation Division, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the FBI.

Scheme participants bought homes in Windsor Village near Arlington Avenue and 21st Street in Indianapolis for $50,000 each, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said. Then, with the help of inflated appraisals, they recruited investors to take out $96,000 loans to purchase the homes for $120,000 each.

No payments were made on the mortgages and the lenders lost the entire loan amounts, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said. Many of the duplexes were later resold for between $3,500 and $15,000.

Jaquess and Charter Homes were the subject of an IBJ investigative story last year.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office said Jaquess used another of his companies, Homevestors LLC, to negotiate the purchase and sale of the first 11 properties in Windsor Village. He listed three of the properties as having sold for $120,000 each on the Multiple Listing Service, allowing the sales to be considered as comparable on appraisals of the remaining properties.

After each closing, Homevestors issued a check of about $42,000 to Jaquess personally or to a family member, a check to the person “fronting” the down payments and a $4,000 check to the investor.

Jaquess has not been charged with crimes relating to Charter-developed neighborhoods including downtown’s King Park, Fishers Creek on the east side and The Reserve at Royal Oaks in Greenwood. But current and former Charter business partners who spoke to IBJ for stories in August and October 2008 described a similar scheme in which the company recruited and paid buyers to take out inflated mortgages on homes it built, promising to manage the properties as rentals and make payments for the owners.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I'd love to see a photo of this crook so I can STAY AWAY from him once he's out of the pokie.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT