EDITORIAL: Program gives people a financial leg up

 IBJ Staff
October 3, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

“Can I write you a check?”

“I need to stop at the ATM.”

“I’ll pay with my debit card.”

Those are routine expressions for most of us. But not so for 10 percent of Indianapolis residents—the ones without a bank account.

That’s right—nearly 80,000 people in the city are “unbanked” and therefore lack this basic building block to financial health. A bank account seems such a simple thing. But without it, people are unlikely to save money, own their home, or support themselves in retirement.

Instead, they’ll keep cash on hand and spend 5 percent of their income on check-cashing and money orders. They’re likely to be poor and stay poor.

A new program called Bank on Indy aims to change that. The campaign, which launches this month, will offer free or low-cost bank accounts to people without one.

Bank on Indy is a partnership comprising Mayor Greg Ballard and his wife, Winnie; 12 banks and credit unions; social service providers; and the Federal Reserve Bank, among others.

This is exactly the type of public-private cooperation that has helped the city overcome other daunting challenges. We congratulate the banks for their willingness to work with risky customers, who could turn out to be successful longtime clients. These new-account holders may become full participants in the economy, building not only their own assets but those of our community.

Bank on Indy is modeled after similar efforts in San Francisco, where 31,000 accounts were opened, and in Evansville, where 324 accounts have been opened in the first six months of the program.

Bank on Indy’s financial education component should help assure that, once people get an account, they know how to use it responsibly. Some people don’t have accounts because of prior problems.

“Second chances seem hard to come by in the financial world, but second chances are well worth the investment,” Winnie Ballard said upon announcing the program.

A bank account—it’s a simple thing, but an essential first step in becoming truly self-sufficient.

A turning point for IPS?

After years of hemorrhaging more than 1,000 students a year, the bleeding at Indianapolis Public Schools has nearly stopped.

IPS lost 300 students this year, far less than the 1,900 it had expected to lose. It’s the smallest decline since charter schools were introduced here seven years ago.

That is good news for Indianapolis. A strong city needs strong schools—and not just in the suburbs. Today’s students are tomorrow’s workers, so a healthier IPS ultimately means a healthier local economy.

This sudden stabilization in enrollment may mean that some of IPS’ investment in creative programs is paying off. Indeed, two of its newest ones, the Shortridge Magnet High School for Law and Public Policy and the arts and humanities magnet at Broad Ripple High School, have waiting lists. In all, 590 students are on waiting lists at 17 IPS schools. And 120 other students chose to attend IPS although they live outside the district.

A one-year change does not a trend make. But it’s a long-awaited positive sign. Our compliments to IPS.•


To comment on these editorials, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.