IBJNews

Daniels warns of more cuts amid revenue declines

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels warned Thursday morning that more state budget cuts could be coming in light of a prolonged drop in tax collections.

The governor held a press conference at the Statehouse to announce that Indiana collected $2.8 billion in total revenue during the fiscal first quarter, $474 million less than it did during the most recent period.  Further, collections were 8 percent less than what the state had forecast.

Daniels declined to reveal what actions he might take to help stop the bleeding, instead opting to wait until the next state forecast is released in December before deciding how to proceed.

“Nothing’s off the table right now, but let’s not act impulsively,” he said. “It’s very likely we’ll have to take more dramatic steps than we’ve taken right now.”

Those include the possibility of employee layoffs and suspending or postponing certain state programs.

The budget has already cut most agency spending by about 10 percent. The reductions are largely being made by not filling job vacancies, reducing travel and delaying some capital projects.

First-quarter sales taxes, which account for 40 percent of state revenue, were $183 million lower than in the fiscal first quarter of 2008 and $71 million lower what was predicted.

Daniels said the severe impact the recession is having on state finances may prompt officials to update the methods it uses to forecast state revenues.

If revenues remain flat, the state could be in danger of draining its $1.4 billion surplus by 2011. It already has used a quarter of the safety net to help stay afloat.

“We’re not going to turn prisoners out of prison early; we’re not going to close state parks,” Daniels said. “But again, we’re going to do things we’d much rather not do to protect Hoosiers from tax increases.”

The drop in sales tax is connected to the state’s high unemployment rate. Indiana's jobless rate in August fell below double digits for the first time since April. The August seasonally adjusted unemployment rate of 9.9 percent represented a decline of 0.7 percentage points from July. 

But Daniels is wary of the drop, and state officials have acknowledged the decline could just be a blip.

Daniels said he sees no evidence in his travels around the state that the unemployment rate is dropping and “doesn’t trust” the current numbers.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Watch my cuz,Mit , is he ready to cave-in ? Dont say i did not warn you.bigd
  • Mr. Daniels lack of faith in the unemployment numbers proves to me that he is still able to think for himself. Of course, we all know that those numbers reflect mainly those Hoosiers who have run out of benefits and are no longer being counted; for a politician to admit something is "off" is very refreshing.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT