Humane Society CEO steps down

Jennifer Whitson
June 19, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Six years after taking the helm of the struggling Humane Society of Indianapolis, CEO Martha Boden has left the not-for-profit as the agency's board looks to transform it into a "smaller, leaner organization," Chairman David Horth said.

"It became obvious to the HSI board, and to Martha, that it no longer made sense for any individual to lead the organization at the CEO level," Horth said in a statement issued yesterday. Instead, the board realigned its administrative and operations staff and is recruiting an executive director.

As CEO, Boden's salary was $105,000, according to Horth, and a new leader will like make approximately $30,000 less.

Boden relocated to Indianapolis from Minnesota to take the job in 2002, drawing on a background in private-sector marketing and project management. She had her work cut out for her, as the shelter wrestled with waning donations and rising costs.

In 2003, the Humane Society board approved a plan spearheaded by Boden to borrow against the society's endowments, worth a total of $4.6 million, to prop up its annual budget.

The theory was that the $2.3 million credit line would ease the immediate pressure to cover the shelter's operating budget, which grew to more than $3 million in 2006, while Boden and others worked to boost fund raising.

But expenses continued to outpace fund raising and, in late 2007, the agency upped its credit line to nearly $3 million.

In mid-March, the organization stopped accepting stray animals and owner-surrendered pets unless owners first went through counseling. The "Reservations Required" program is intended to help the Humane Society use its limited resources more effectively. Strays are being transferred to the city's Animal Care and Control shelter.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.