Arts and depression

May 20, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Two books I’m in the midst of reading combine to raise questions about the future of art and audiences.

The first, “Against Happiness,” posits that our society’s increased emphasis on smoothing over the rough edges of life (through pharmaceuticals and other means) could ultimately kill our creative spirit.

To back up his claim, author Eric Wilson offers a litany of creations—from Herman Melville’s “Moby-Dick” to Bruce Springsteen’s “Nebraska”—that wouldn’t exist if its creators weren’t down in the dumps. And the list goes on: Beethoven. Plath. Van Gogh. Not a particularly happy lot.

Then there’s Daniel S. Burt’s “The Drama 100: A Ranking of the Greatest Plays of All Time,” which is bound to provoke argument or dismissal from theater lovers (How, for instance, do you decide where “Angels in America” stands in comparison to “A Raisin in the Sun” or “Glengarry Glen Ross”?)

But, that being said, let’s look at some of Burt’s top choices—“King Lear,” “Hamlet,” “Long Day’s Journey Into Night,” “Medea”… You’d be hard-pressed to find a smile in the bunch.

So do artistic greatness and depression go hand in hand?

More personally, when you go out for a night of theater, is it harder for you to get motivated to see something that isn’t likely to be fun?

And do you find yourself more resistant to depressing shows now than you did years ago?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I don't think people have to be depressed in order to create great art, but I do think they have to have the courage to feel whatever it is they are feeling.

    I also think that it is easier to label a depressing piece great art than a humorous piece because pain is pretty universal and humor is more personal, harder to agree on.

    When I go out for a night of theatre, sometimes I base my selection of show on my mood, but it is rare that I want something easy more than something cathartic. Depressing for the sake of being depressing? No. But an honest exploration of the human experience? Yes.

    I'll have to think some more about how my approach has changed over the years.

    More about this topic later, maybe...

    Hope Baugh
    www.IndyTheatreHabit.com
  • Hmmm...depression and art. Any profound (emotional) experience is often a catalyst for self-expression of some sort.

    It seems that the creative person (that would be all of us in one way or another) needs an outlet for unraveling a metamorphasis that he or she doesn't yet fully understand. To make beauty out of something that is terrifying, gratifying, inspiring...you get the picture...helps us move through, not around, the experience.

    Creativity is like sharing an intimate piece of yourself so that others get it too. It's life giving.

    Creating is more about the 'process' - it's like the layers of feeling/experience can be made a bit tangible through one's media of choice. When you let go, the work takes on a life of its own and whatever set you in motion has become more tame.

    I agree with Hope. I choose my entertainment be it a play, live music, film, television (do I dare put that here while discussing art - does Family Guy count?), an art gallery walk...by what I need to add that element of spice to my life. It's like fuel in my tank.

    Sometimes it is tragedy...but I'll have to say lately it's more likely comedy or satire that draws me. Guess I'm looking for levity and beauty.
  • Thank for your thoughts. Anyone else want to chime in?

    Both of you mentioned selecting based on mood. This does not bode well for arts companies selling season subscriptions...

    Lou

    P.S. And, Deb, by all means mention Family Guy here. As often as you like.
  • Your previous post prompted me to buy tickets to Sweeney Todd for me and my daughter, not because I feel the need to be depressed or horrified, but because it's a high-caliber show she's interested in seeing, and I want to foster her interest.

    With artwork, I have to admit that I'm usually more intrigued by pieces that seems to come from a more visceral place within the artist, which often means depression or angst. I love intelligently, bitingly funny art, too, especially art that comments on society or politics.

    When it comes to movies and TV, I've found with age that I go to laugh or maybe be moved in a positive way. My days of getting depressed from watching Taps and Old Yeller are over.
  • I think mood plays a big part in it, but if something is good, really good, it's worth it. Though somethings can be so disturbing that you only need to see them once. My case in point would be Schindler's List. A great movie, but so disturbing and emotional for me that once is all I could sit through, and I still have vivid scenes from it stuck in my head.

    I have lots of friends in theater, so sometimes my mood doesn't matter as I go out to support them. I've seen some great plays that might not have been on my radar otherwise.

    I think all ranges of human emotion can create great art. I don't think depression should be singled out as the driving force. I think alot of great art has come from someone's pain, but at the same time we have great art from someone's joy or grief, or even boredom.

    I don't think anyone can say that some great art wouldn't exist if the modern medications we have now were available to them. It doesn't mean they would've chosen to take them. Some people are aware of the source of their creativity and might not want to lose that -even if for their own good. And who is to say that if they had taken meds and were shiny, happy people, that they wouldn't have produced something just as grand, albeit more uplifting in someway. In addition, I would add that human emotion is not the only inspiration for artists. Think of all the wonderful works inspired by nature.
  • Just a random thought
    I was diagnosed with depression 3 yrs ago. Since that time, I have been on medication (dual action to rebuild synaptic connections and reduce anxiety). Since the diagnosis, I have not had a desire to return to any artistic endeavours that I used to thrive on: crafting, artwork, playing music. I just don't have the drive/energy.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Hiking blocks to an office after fighting traffic is not logical. Having office buildings around the loop, 465 and in cities in surrounding counties is logical. In other words, counties around Indianapolis need office buildings like Keystone, Meridian, Michigan Road/College Park and then no need to go downtown. Financial, legal, professional businesses don't need the downtown when Carmel, Fishers, North Indy are building their own central office buildings close to the professionals. The more Hamilton, Boone county attract professionals, the less downtown is relevant. Highrises have no meaning if they don't have adequate parking for professionals and clients. Great for show, but not exactly downtown Chicago, no lakefront, no river to speak of, and no view from highrises of lake Michigan and the magnificent mile. Indianapolis has no view.

  2. "The car count, THE SERIES, THE RACING, THE RATINGS, THE ATTENDANCE< AND THE MANAGEMENT, EVERY season is sub-par." ______________ You're welcome!

  3. that it actually looked a lot like Sato v Franchitti @Houston. And judging from Dario's marble mouthed presentation providing "color", I'd say that he still suffers from his Dallara inflicted head injury._______Considering that the Formula E cars weren't going that quickly at that exact moment, that was impressive air time. But I guess we shouldn't be surprised, as Dallara is the only car builder that needs an FAA certification for their cars. But flying Dallaras aren't new. Just ask Dan Wheldon.

  4. Does anyone know how and where I can get involved and included?

  5. While the data supporting the success of educating our preschoolers is significant, the method of reaching this age group should be multi-faceted. Getting business involved in support of early childhood education is needed. But the ways for businesses to be involved are not just giving money to programs and services. Corporations and businesses educating their own workforce in the importance of sending a child to kindergarten prepared to learn is an alternative way that needs to be addressed. Helping parents prepare their children for school and be involved is a proven method for success. However, many parents are not sure how to help their children. The public is often led to think that preschool education happens only in schools, daycare, or learning centers but parents and other family members along with pediatricians, librarians, museums, etc. are valuable resources in educating our youngsters. When parents are informed through work lunch hour workshops in educating a young child, website exposure to exceptional teaching ideas that illustrate how to encourage learning for fun, media input, and directed community focus on early childhood that is when a difference will be seen. As a society we all need to look outside the normal paths of educating and reaching preschoolers. It is when methods of involving the most important adult in a child's life - a parent, that real success in educating our future workers will occur. The website www.ifnotyouwho.org is free and illustrates activities that are research-based, easy to follow and fun! Businesses should be encouraging their workers to tackle this issue and this website makes it easy for parents to be involved. The focus of preschool education should be to inspire all the adults in a preschooler's life to be aware of what they can do to prepare a child for their future life. Fortunately we now know best practices to prepare a child for a successful start to school. Is the business community ready to be involved in educating preschoolers when it becomes more than a donation but a challenge to their own workers?

ADVERTISEMENT