“Assassins” shot down

February 22, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
"All of us have a healthy respect for the freedom of artistic expression that college theater represents, and all of us agree that out of respect for the families of those victims of the tragedies at Northern Illinois University and Virginia Tech, and from an abundance of caution, it is best at this time not to undertake a campus production that contains the portrayal of graphically violent scenes."

So says Arkansas Tech President Robert C. Brown in an effort to explain why he put the kabosh on a student production of the musical "Assassins" that was scheduled to open this weekend. More details here.

"Assassins"—which was recently staged in Indy by Low Brow Productions at the Hedback Theatre and was presented years back at the Phoenix—looks at all of the people who have attempted to kill U.S. Presidents.

It does not come down in favor of their actions.

So what's your reaction to Brown’s move? If you disagree with it, are there any circumstances in which an administration would be justified in shutting down a student production?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • That's just plain dumb. The play doesn't have anything to do with school shootings. That's just someone over-reacting. I feel badly for the students who had put in their time and effort.
  • Our Nation's understanding and appreciation of the First Amendment is not passed along genetically. It must be reaffirmed and defended, over and over. Keep fighting and keep winning. ~ Paul Steinle

    Here are the addresses to use when contacting the ATU administration about the cancellation of the Stephen Sondheim and John Weidman play “Assassins. Please get involved.

    snail-mail:

    Dr. Robert Brown
    c/o Susie Nicholson
    1509 North Boulder Ave.
    Russellville AR 72801
    Administration Building

    e-mail:

    rcbrown@atu.edu Dr. Robert Brown, ATU President

    georgena.duncan@atu.edu Dr. Georgina Duncan, ATU Dean of Liberal Arts


    telephone:

    (479) 968-0237 for the president's office

    OR

    The Courier (letters to the editor)

    www.couriernews.com/letters.php


    The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (letters to the editor)

    www2.arkansasonline.com/contact/voicesform
  • Just wanted to make clear that the LH above is not Lou Harry.
  • I am a student at ATU, and yes, I completely disagree with the administration's decision. I urge people to get involved and spread the word about this. Brown has claimed he was worried about the sound of gun shots being heard outside and around the theater.

    When they performed on Wednesday, they had to use their hands and say, Bang! Bang! in place of the prop guns. They couldn't even use wooden guns! It truly is a slap in the face to all the hard work and effort put into the production. My heart goes out to all those involved. The only time I've seen people that upset over something was when someone died... and in a way, something did die... their hard work, time, effort, and their chances to perform for an audience.
  • Unless a production poses a potential physical threat to students' safety, I see few justifiable reasons for the administration of a University to get involved in the content of performances on its grounds.

    Universities, more than any other kind of institution, need to be preserved as safe havens for free inquiry of all kinds. When people are grieving and sensitive about violence, what good does it do to suppress their ability to explore those feelings in context? Art gives us an excellent and safe environment with which to respond to life - with questions, fears, celebration, or release.

    Aristotle originally wrote about theatre as a literally cathartic experience, by which viewers could purge their emotions through identification with and/or consideration of the events onstage. A production like Assassins could have offered an opportunity to open up discussion about violence in American culture, and what leads people to engage in sociopathic behavior. Since it happens in front of you, the show provides a more immediate and engaging forum for those discussions than a philosophy or criminal justice class. Couldn't understanding the pathology of someone like John Hinckley offer an outlet for some of the feelings of loss, confusion, and astonishment at the actions of people who shoot up campuses?

    In other words, it seems that President Brown has sacrificed an opportunity for honest exploration of a traumatic event, out of fear that his own students will misinterpret a play and be upset. Doesn't that bespeak a lack of trust in his students' intelligence and judgment?

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT