LOU'S VIEWS: In Indy Opera’s ‘Flying Dutchman,’ strong voices almost drowned by overdone visuals

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

Indianapolis Opera’s truncated 2012/2013 season featured only three productions—one of which was actually an IU Opera presentation. That put enormous pressure—even more enormous than usual—on the season’s only IO-created grand opera, “The Flying Dutchman” (May 10, 12). Compounding the challenge: Last season’s closer, a “Faust” outstanding visually and vocally, set a high bar.

Many of the same elements were in play here, but the result, while fine, didn’t achieve the same magic.

ae-flyingdutchman-092-15col.jpg A strong chorus livened up Wagner’s “The Flying Dutchman,” the only large-scale opera of the season created by Indianapolis Opera. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

No fault on the performers. There aren’t many dimensions to play with the Dutchman—he’s doomed to cruise the seas until he finds a maiden willing to love him until death and doesn’t seem to be too picky about who he picks. But bass-baritone Kevin Short sang the haunted title character with determination and force.

Tenor Garrett Sorenson made the supporting role of Erik, the jilted lover, feel more like a lead and perked the proceedings up whenever he appeared. As the apex of their passions, Jane Dutton was appealing if at times uncertain vocally.

As the father who willingly turns his daughter over to the Dutchman as a way to acquire treasure, bass-baritone Kristopher Irmiter brought much-need humor to the gloomy tale. And the chorus proved glorious, as powerful collectively as the able and strong Indianapolis Chamber Orchestra.

While his projection-based visuals added to “Faust,” though, stage director Joachim Schamberger’s set and video design weighed down this “Dutchman.” Images, projected on a scrim, wore out their welcome and, in the case of the boat being tossed by waves, bordered on comical. Even in opera, sometimes less is more.

Schamberger’s take on the story isn’t about a lovesick gal and a bewitched guy but, rather, about an attempt to reunite the two halves of a person into a whole. He sees the Dutchman and Senta as a single person—an interesting concept but, unfortunately, its setup pulls attention away from the overture. Rather than offer a chance for the audience to settle in with Wagner, he diverts attention with added stage action.

What seems forgotten: The primary glory of grand opera is the music (that’s why, for instance, we talk of Mozart’s “The Magic Flute” rather than librettist Schikaneder’s “The Magic Flute”). Again, less might have equaled more.

To his credit, Schamberger’s concept does lead to a visually powerful last moment, beautifully staged and played. I’m just not convinced it charted the best course to get there.

Amy Herzog’s “4000 Miles,” being given a luminously low-key production at the Phoenix Theatre (through June 9), does what seems to be a simple thing but is actually a rarity in contemporary theater. It lets its characters be.

Not-so-fresh from a bike ride across the country, Leo (Andrew Martin) arrives at the apartment of his grandmother in New York.

He’s primarily riding away from things—the death of his best friend, an awkward encounter with his adopted sister, responsibility in general—rather than toward anything. His ex-girlfriend visits. So does a potential new conquest (a breath of smartly drawn fresh air from actress Arianne Villareal).

But the play focuses on Leo and his grandmother, Vera (Martha Jacobs, earning rather than demanding respect, laughs and tears). She’s an octogenarian more angry than sad about the moments when her “head isn’t really right.” She takes him in, listens (when her hearing aid is turned on) and, well, don’t look for tons of plot twists and shocking revelations. Herzog has more subtle things in mind.

Neither her leads nor her supporting characters are generic types. They are specific people. Every quirk doesn’t have a late-in-the-show payoff. Their issues aren’t resolved with hugs (although there are some beautiful, complex hugging moments). They are living through their specific, sometimes messy, lives and Herzog respects that, which is enormously refreshing.

The only place the narrative stumbled for me was in a revelatory monologue that’s overwritten and unnecessarily absurd. The scene, though, is smartly directed and beautifully acted, ending in the magical transformation of what could be a bring-down-the-house punchline into a sweet, truthful and far more satisfying moment.

Other shows may have better scripts, stronger performances or more interesting design and direction, but I haven’t seen anything else this season where all of those work together so harmoniously.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.