ATP branding plan nets criticism

April 10, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
roddickThe ATP is considering placing its name across the nets at all of its tournaments, a groundbreaking move that is drawing criticism from tournament promoters.

As a test, the men’s tennis circuit placed its new moniker, ATP World Tour, on the nets of practice courts at the Pacific Life Open last month in Indian Wells, Calif.

Tournament promoters are worried about the effect such branding could have on their title sponsors as well as whether the branding could detract from the Olympus U.S. Open Series, the four-year-old branded circuit of summer hard court events in which the U.S. Tennis Association has invested tens of millions of dollars. The ATP tournament in Indianapolis is part of the U.S. Open Series.

“When a title sponsor makes a major investment in a tournament, they buy the tournament brand,” Anne Worcester, director of the men’s and women’s Pilot Pen Tennis tournaments in New Haven, Conn., told Street & Smith’s Sports Business Journal. Whether the ATP name on the nets “diminished that title sponsor branding is a real issue,” she said.

Organizers of the Indianapolis tournament—held July 12-20 this year—would appear to have much to be concerned about. After losing RCA as its title sponsor following the 2006 tournament, officials for the Indianapolis ATP Tour stop just signed a major deal with Eli Lilly Inc., and the tournament has become known as Indianapolis Tennis Championships presented by Lilly. Protecting Lilly’s interests, sports marketers said, is paramount for local tournament organizers.

USTA officials are worried the ATP’s effort to stamp its brand so blatantly in the field of play could hamper efforts to market the Open Series, which includes six ATP events. There also is concern about corporate clutter, with the ATP’s corporate sponsor logos already on the net posts.

ATP officials said they are still testing the idea and are seeking feedback from players, fans, sponsors and television partners. It is not yet clear if ATP will plaster its brand on nets at Indianapolis this year. ATP officials said they would continue testing on practice courts and make a decision after Wimbledon, which concludes July 6.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT