Bank seeks abatement to construct office space along I-69

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Economic development leaders in Fishers are asking the Town Council to OK a six-year property tax abatement to help First Internet Bancorp construct as many as two office buildings on property overlooking Interstate 69.

The Indianapolis-based parent of First Internet Bank on July 25 opened a mortgage processing center at 11201 USA Parkway, a 49,700-square-foot Fishers building that formerly housed a St. Vincent Health medical center.

Becker Becker

First Internet expects to invest $4.3 million in the building east of the highway, a commitment that early this year helped it secure a two-year property tax abatement worth $127,500. The property can accommodate two more 40,000-square-foot buildings, and company founder David Becker plans to keep growing operations there.

“That gives us capacity for future growth without having to scramble to find a location,” said Becker, who lives about a seven-minute drive from the Fishers site. 

More than 60 employees already fill the third floor of the building, Becker said, and remodeling on the first floor should start later this year. More than a dozen prospects have expressed interest in leasing space on the second floor.

Although it still has room to expand there, the bank is asking Fishers to consider a tax abatement for a Class A office building or buildings that could accommodate future growth. The bank has asked for a six-year tax break on the new office space that would save it a total of about $426,000. A resolution up for the council's consideration requires that the work start by 2018.

“The business is growing very rapidly and they’re already thinking about their next building,” said Tom Dickey, Fishers’ director of community development. “Whenever the time is right, we want them to know they have a financial commitment from Fishers.”office-factbox.gif

First Internet has added about 25 employees since the beginning of the year, Becker said. It maintains an office near Keystone at the Crossing, but he said a portion of that operation could move to Fishers when the lease expires in five years.

The bank is promising just five jobs paying at least $30,000 a year in connection with the new office space, which it estimates will cost about $4 million to build. Actual employment is likely to be higher, Becker said, but construction likely would start before the space is required.

“We would build it before we need it, without question,” he said. “We could start it and lease it out.”

That would be just fine with town leaders, who are eager to accommodate other employers looking for space in the heavily traveled corridor.

“We want to use this as a tool to get the building started,” Dickey said.

And the sooner, the better. Upscale Class A office space is in short supply in the fast-growing suburb, Dickey said, citing second-quarter vacancy rates of less than 3 percent. Less than 9,000 square feet of such space was available for lease during the quarter, according to data from real estate brokerage Cassidy Turley.

Developer John Edgeworth called the local office market “bipolar,” saying there’s a shortage of contiguous space for large users but plenty of options in the 5,000- to 10,000-square-foot range.

His Edgeworth Laskey Properties LLC is attempting to address demand for headquarters-worthy space in Fishers with Two Concourse at Crosspoint, a five-story, 133,000-square-foot speculative building under construction west of I-69.

It will be part of the $100 million Concourse at Crosspoint office complex, launched in 2008 as the economic meltdown began. The first building in the park opened in 2010 and is now fully leased, he said.

No deals for the new building are in place yet, but Edgeworth expects tenants to be signed before it opens in mid-2014.

“Decision makers and employees want to be close to home, and that is a great location,” he said.

Edgeworth and partner Tom Laskey had enough confidence in the area’s potential, in fact, that they ignored brokers who urged the firm to develop call center space on the 26-acre property south of 106th Street. He credited town leaders—then and now—who wanted more for Fishers.

Case in point: In 2008, Fishers issued $10.8 million in tax-increment-financing bonds to cover infrastructure work for the entire five-building development. So Edgeworth Laskey didn’t have to come back to the town to ask for more help before it pulled the trigger on Two Concourse this summer.

First Internet’s abatement request presents a similar situation, Dickey said. If the Town Council approves the financial incentive for a new building now, the bank can start construction when the time is right—without navigating officialdom again.•


  • Double talk
    I recently removed my business from the town of fishers because of high property taxes, drainage fees and we'll call it "the double talk" by the towns planning manager and the town council. I was negotiated new zoning with the staff and council which was approved. 150 days later they attempted to meet without notifying me to change the zoning and limit some of it's uses in direct opposition to the approval they had just provided my company and property. I'm sure the long term math works out for future development giving this developer a tax deferment. My point to this topic is this; Small businessmen will always loose in arrangements like mine when dealing with The Town of Fishers and large business like the one in question will always win when doing business in the back room deals with the town of Fishers. If this developer is willing to invest 4million is the $500,000 tax deferment going to make or break the deal or is it going to just maintain his profit margin.?? This is a deal cut in the back rooms of the town and the coffee shops in the Fishers community. The culture in the towns planning staffs' operations and the councils actions I would describe as dishonest as evidenced by their actions in my company's case. You can never believe what they do or say one day to be the same the next week. I honestly don't know who would ever want to have their business in the town of Fishers.( unless they were gettting big tax breaks) The message I received from the town staff and the town council is this. Take your business out of our town, develop on the outskirts and or internet and come into our community and extract dollars without paying our high taxes or deal with our "community leaders" in the town council. My response... Done deal.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

  2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

  3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

  4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

  5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.