IBJNews

Bank seeks foreclosure on two strip centers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A Hamilton, Ohio-based lender is seeking to foreclose on two Indianapolis strip centers owned by the same person.

First Financial Bank, which purchased distressed Irwin Union Bank in Columbus, Ind., in 2009, filed suit April 5 against Woodland Shops LLC and Lakewood Shops LLC, and also named their owner, Kurtis L. Mathewson.

Mathewson, also a race car driver, is a former director at Coldwell Banker Commercial in Indianapolis and co-owns local go-kart shop Evolution Karting on Gasoline Alley on the city’s west side.

First Financial is seeking the appointment of a receiver at both strip centers, which are alleged to owe the bank a total of $2.6 million.

Woodland Shops is located at 7102-7134 Woodland Drive near West 71st Street and Interstate 465 on the city’s northwest side. The 19,716-square-foot center, built in 2000, is anchored by Chef Mike’s Charcoal Grill.

Lakewood Shops, 5990 E. 71st St., is near Binford Boulevard on the northeast side.

First Financial alleges Irwin Union gave four loans to the strip centers between June 2004 and April 2009. Woodland and Lakewood in turn defaulted on terms of two loans by failing to make full monthly payments beginning in October 2009, First Financial alleges.

Also, the centers failed to pay the mature and accelerated balances on two additional loans.

First Financial filed the foreclosure in Marion Superior Court.
 


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Back in my teens/early 20s, Chicago's in Greenfield was a spot where my friends and I ate on a constant basis. Chicago's has always offered good pizza and bread sticks, but after getting married and buying a home, their prices and locations have made it so I would only get their pizza once every three years. They have expanded into McCordsville, but sadly closed the downtown Indy store years ago (this was the coolest layout for a restaurant in my opinion).

    Just recently we decided to try Chicago's at the old Greenfield location. While it was clean, they haven't updated much over the last five years or so. Still the same layout, booths, tables, etc.. I made a comment to my wife about how that place hasn't changed in years. Good to see they are doing well enough to build a newer building.

  2. INDIANA CASINOS ARE TIGHT. OTHER OUTSIDE CASINOS HAVE WINNERS ALL DAY LONG. PEOPLE HIT REGULARLY AT OUTSIDE CASINOS, INDIANA CASINOS HAVE FEW WINNERS ESPECIALLY THE LARGER JACKPOT WINNERS. PEOPLE ARE NOT WINNING ENOUGH AT INDIANA CASINO , SO THEY ARE NOT FUN TO VISIT. I,D RATHER TRAVEL TO OUTSIDE CASINO AND TAKE THE CHANCE ON WINNING AND HAVING FUN DOING THAT , THEN TO KNOW THAT YOUR CHANCES AT WINNING AT A INDIANA CASINO AREFAR AND IN BETWEEN.

  3. record low crowd and a record low TV audience.

  4. for an IRL carb day. Like a record tv number,,,,that would be soooo hard

  5. For those of you who think the state didn't do as much as they should...the state did $6M more than they should!!! As a taxpayer I am opposed to the $6M!!!

ADVERTISEMENT