Barron's magazine names state's best financial advisers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Indiana boasts 15 of the nation’s top 1,000 financial advisers, according to Barron’s. The majority of them work for Merrill Lynch, and all but two live in Indianapolis. The financial publication ranks Thomas Buck, 56, of Indianapolis, the state’s best. He manages $875 million for Merrill Lynch.

Tom Buck mug Buck

In its Feb. 22 edition, Barron’s named and ranked the financial advisers it considers the cream of the crop in all 50 states. To be considered, advisers were required to have at least seven years of financial services experience and to have worked for their current firm at least a year.

Merrill Lynch led Indiana, with nine top advisers. It also had the most advisers on the total list, by a long stretch, with 239. Wachovia Securities had the second-most among the top 1,000, with 135; followed by Smith Barney with 122; Morgan Stanley with 121; and UBS, with 118.

Barron’s measured the advisers in terms of how much money they have under management, their return on assets, their client satisfaction and retention, their regulatory compliance, and their community involvement. Here’s how the full list broke down:

1. Thomas Buck, Merrill Lynch, Indianapolis: $875 million in total assets

2. Martin Gregor, Merrill Lynch, Indianapolis: $1.1 billion in total assets

3. Eric Payne, Merrill Lynch, Indianapolis: $700 million in total assets

4. Chris Cooke, Wells Fargo Advisers, Indianapolis: $1.1 billion in total assets

5. Brian Cooke, Wells Fargo Advisers, Indianapolis: $1.1 billion in total assets

6. Richard Searles, Merrill Lynch, Indianapolis: $587 million in assets

7. William Craig Dobbs, Graystone Consulting, Indianapolis: $8.8 billion in total assets

8. Jonathan Klausner, UBS Financial Services, Indianapolis: $720 million in total assets

9. Carleton Evans, Merrill Lynch, Indianapolis: $348 million in total assets

10. Jim Schillaci, Merrill Lynch, Indianapolis: $180 million in total assets

11. Kevin McMullen, Merrill Lynch, Indianapolis: $262 million in total assets

12. Ron Mencias, Merrill Lynch, Indianapolis: $700 million in total assets

13. Paul Stscherban, Robert W. Baird, Mishawaka: $345 million in total assets

14. Matthew Kahn, Merrill Lynch, South Bend: $525 million in total assets

15. John Cate, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, Indianapolis: $900 million in total assets


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.