Beat goes on at Verizon

June 14, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Will the owners of Verizon Wireless Music Center find a buyer? So far, the answer is no. Verizon Wireless (AP photo)Several brokers say the unofficial asking price of more than $40 million is outrageous. They say there are too many barriers to redevelopment of the 203-acre property and too much cheaper land nearby. For now, the venue's management is assuming this summer won't be the last for concerts at the former Deer Creek. You may have already read the story in the print IBJ. If not, check it out here. Either way, what do you think about the venue and what, if anything, should replace it?
  • Nothing should replace it - it's a good venue. What would go there? More vinyl-sided homes contributing to sprawl that will be worth way less than their selling price when gas hits $4 - $5 per gallon? No thanks.
  • Sure. that's what HamCo is all about, crappy houses in vinyl. WRSP Lawn is much better. I see alot more stuff going on there that I want to see, instead of that Margaritaville/Johnny Cougar retread crap that happens every summer up there. My opinion, but my money talks too.

    Oh, yeah, don't miss Iron Maiden up there. :lol:
  • Da Hooey -- I don't know that you can blame the low quality of shows at Verizon Wireless on the venue. It's part of the Live Nation network of venues and typically gets the best of what's available. What's available just happens to suck.

    Personally, I think Verizon is a great place to see a show. However, I don't see anything about it that makes it irreplaceable. It's built on a cornfield with an artificial hill. You could do the exact same thing near Plainfield on the westside or out past Cumberland on the east side. Or anywhere outside 465, for that matter.

    I think people who don't want to see it torn down are just having a hard time detaching their wonderful concert experiences from what is basically a generic outdoor amphitheater.

    The Lawn, while a much smaller venue, has the great backdrop of the river on one side and downtown on the other. That kind of setting isn't reproducible in Indy. What the smaller setting also allows them to do is bring in more fresh, up-and-coming acts that don't have a huge following yet. It just makes more a much more interesting concert experience.
  • CorrND, I agree. I just hate the location (both internal and external) of Deer Creek.

    One thought I have about concert offerings around here, and especially during the summer: Take a look at and you will see all the truly great tours are in Yurp right now, because they make a lot of cash playing the summer outdoor festivals over there. It's unbelievable the line-ups offered.

    And if you are looking for a great show - try the Snow Patrol show @ WRSP on Augsut 3rd. Saw them in Chicago last fall - amazing.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.