Beckmann Theatre folds

January 23, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
The Beckmann Theatre--named for Robert D. Beckmann Jr., first president of the Arts Council of Indianapolis--announced today that it will cease operations.

"Given the current economic climate and competition for entertainment dollars and sponsorships, the Beckmann Theatre has made the painful decision to cease operations," the company announced in a press release.


You should be forgiven if you aren't familiar with the company. Founded in 2002, the professional theater never offered a full season. Its ad hoc productions included David Mamet's "American Buffalo" at the Phoenix Theatre and a 2005 site-specific presentation of David Schanker’s “Asylum.” It also hosted a number of reading of Schanker's in-development play play about the Tony Kiritsis Monument Circle hostage incident.


The company stated that, after paying its bills, leftover funds will be donated to the Beckmann Emerging Artist Fund at the Arts Council of Indianapolis.


My only experience with the Beckmann was attending one of its benefit cabaret productions. Have you see any? Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Too bad you missed Asylum. Good script by David Schanker, good production crew and good cast, if I do say so myself, since I was in it. Presented in 3/4 round very close to the actors and not a bad seat in the house. Well received by audiences, some of whom had connections to the old Central State Hospital, where the play's events took place and where the play was staged (in the old laundry building).
  • They had two benefit cabaret productions in 2006 & 2007- those were the last 2 productions I know of them putting on. I was under the impression that they were fundraisers for the theatre- both well attended and the performers volunteered their talents. Not sure what happened with the funds from those benefits, but perhaps they were extremely behind in their bills.
  • This is a damn shame and a disservice to the memory of Bob Beckmann. There was some really good press during Asylum, and the audiences seemed very enthusiastic. The sign of a good Organization is their ability to follow-up and capitalize on success and that doesn't seem to have taken place. Not sure where the blame lies, but it seems to have been more than just the economy. Glad to hear that the Beckmann name has another avenue - through the Arts Council.
  • Bob Beckmann should have something else of quality named after him - particularly in the theatre realm. It was a pleasure and learning experience being involved with him during the days of the Coalition of Indianapolis Artists when arts organizations banded together to help create and politically push through the creation of the Arts Council of Indianapolis. Beckmann's legacy needs to be remembered.

    For a bit of photo history of some of those times and a few shots of Beckmann as hot of the Creative Affair - go to: http://web.me.com/artistdan/A_Creative_Affair/A_Creative_Affair.html
  • So sad. But I don't buy their cry of given the current economic crisis. They
    have been unmoored for a long time. Given their history of being known more
    for their fundraisers than actual production of theatre I feel the blame must be
    laid at the feet of the board and those in charge of the direction of the theatre.
    I find it curious that they are only now announcing their disolve when it has been
    common knowledge that they had made the decision months ago. Bob deserves
    better.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT