"Ben Hur"(in Latin) and more

May 14, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Time to empty the arts notebook:

 --On the short list of bestsellers penned by Hoosiers is 1880's Biblical epic "Ben Hur," by Lew Wallace. Well, now it's coming to the stage in London...in Latin and Aramaic. Click here for more on this ambitious-to-say-the-least production.

--I love a good, creative contest. Here are the results of a recent "Twitter an opera plot" challenge.

--Robin Williams, who put his national tour on hold because of heart surgery, will get back on the road Sept. 30, relaunching the tour at IU Auditorium. See story here.  

--Back in March I blogged about the departure of Dave "The King" Wilson from WIBC. Well, comments keep getting added to the post. Read them here.

--This blog has been growing rapidly in readership so, since many of you may be new here, I'd like to take a minute to remind you that you can also sign up for my free A&E e-mail blast, which goes out every Thursday. To read the latest A&E e-mail, click here. It's filled with A&E recommendations as well as a weekly ticket giveaway (Last week: Four pairs of tickets to the Cabaret at the Connoisseur. This week: A four-pack of tickets for the IMA Summe Nights movie series). Go here to sign up for IBJ Daily and you'll get the Thursday A&E as well as a daily digest of news stories.

Your thoughts?
  • ...comments (about Dave Wilson) have been added... ALMOST DAILY?

    There have been four comments in the last four weeks.

    Why don't you do some original reporting and tell us what the man is up to instead of silly posts like this to drive traffic to the website?

    I like the IBJ a lot (long time print subscriber) but this is dumb.
  • Coyotefan14,
    Fact correction made.
    Go Coyotes!
  • Thanks, although my signature is more of a tribute to AJ Foyt, whose self-designed chassis were called Coyotes.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.