Big Ten Network war takes toll

June 18, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
BTNdoneIt appears that the Big Ten Network’s fight with Comcast Cable is about over.

IBJ reported May 2 that sources close to Comcast Cable and the Big Ten Network said that an agreement to put the yearling network on Comcast’s expanded basic in 94 percent of Big Ten country is imminent. Now, IBJ is hearing that an announcement will likely come next week.

That means it’s time to evaluate the winners and losers. It’s easy to argue that the biggest winners are Big Ten fans in Indiana and across the Midwest who will again be able to watch their favorite teams’ football and basketball games on TV.

But what about the BTN and Comcast? BTN originally asked for $1.10 per subscriber in Big Ten country. Sources familiar with the deal said they’re settling for 70 cents per subscriber.

The channel is set to be offered on the expanded basic package in Big Ten country, not the digital sports tier where Comcast wanted it located. The two sides are still wrestling over a provision in the multi-year contract that could allow Comcast to move the channel to a digital sports tier after 2009. Those digital tiers, as you might have imagined, can be mighty lucrative for cable providers—if they have the content to make them attractive.

Fox Cable Networks owns 49 percent of the BTN and has been throwing its weight around to get this deal done. Fox’s payment to BTN assures that most Big Ten schools will get at least $10.2 million annually from the deal, but BTN’s willingness to take less money per subscriber could hurt the schools' financial take long-term.

While BTN officials are not as close to a deal with Time Warner Cable, the other major provider in Big Ten country, sources expect the Comcast deal to accelerate those negotiations.

So, what do you think? Who are the biggest winners and losers in this deal?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I'm the biggest loser right now since I have Dullhouse (the opposite of bright) cable. Nationally Time Warner makes the deals for Brighthouse so I'm guessing they are the ones working on BTN.

    In the end BTN wins. They get more bucks and all the fans want are the games.
  • Get a dish.
  • I can tell you who loses......ATT U-verse. That is what I was going to switch to unless this deal happened.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT