Big Ten, Pac-10 challenge overdue?

July 7, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
pufballThe idea of an annual Big Ten vs. Pac-10 college football showdown in a series of games—sources within each conference said—is long overdue.

But until now the idea has never been put on the table. Even today, it’s still in the fantasy stage.

The Big Ten plays an annual challenge series in basketball with the Atlantic Coast Conference. The games usually play to packed arenas and earn solid television ratings. Both conferences earn a nice paycheck from the challenge—which the ACC has won each year since it began in 1999.

ESPN was a main driver in creating the Big Ten vs. ACC basketball challenge, and a lucrative broadcast strategy would have to be formulated to get the football challenge out of the dreams of conference fans and onto the blue prints of the conferences’ athletic directors.

The basketball challenge has been successful enough to warrant a six-year contract extension between ESPN and the two participating conferences that runs through 2010.

The marquee Big Ten-ACC basketball match-ups have been tuned in by 2 million households nationwide. Sports marketers think a Big Ten-Pac-10 football challenge could do even better.

One proposal of the football version involves 10 games, with five played on the West Coast and five played in Big Ten country. The match-ups would be determined by the previous year’s conference standings, and the challenge would be used to kick-off each season during the Labor Day weekend.

The football challenge pitting the two powerhouse conferences would end the traditional practice of kicking-off the season with a non-conference cupcake. This year, Indiana opens against Western Kentucky, while Purdue plays Northern Colorado.

Do you think a Big Ten vs. Pac-10 football challenge would work?
  • Who wouldn't love this? The problem though is that these schools like to have that pre-season cupcake to pad their resumes a bit. Even if you are unbeaten against easy teams you are still unbeaten and play in a BCS conference. That can go a longer way than a loss against a good team even if you play a tougher schedule. For the fans this would be great, even though being a Big Ten guy, I dread the fact that we could get humiliated.
  • I would assume that you read the article in the Free Press. With that said, who wouldn't be in favor of it? It would be great for everyone except the one team that would be left out as the Big Ten is really 11.
  • as a USC and Purdue grad would love to see this, had a great time at the Purdue-USC game back in 1998!
  • There are also teams (on the ACC) side left out in the basketball challenge. But all the teams get a cut of the financial pie, and I think that makes this idea very attractive for some of these universities struggling to stay in the black, especially while trying to complete capital projects. For fans, this is a no brainer. What's not to love.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!