Biglari shareholder loses bid to stop $75M stock offering

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A shareholder of Steak n Shake parent Biglari Holdings Inc. has lost his bid to stop a stock offering that he argues will give CEO Sardar Biglari too much control in the publicly traded company.

Judge Sarah Evans Barker of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana rejected shareholder Chad R. Taylor’s request for a preliminary injunction, allowing Biglari Holdings to follow through with its offering to raise $75 million for the company.

Taylor complained in his motion that the offering enables Biglari to unfairly increase his ownership in the company by pricing shares too high. The offering, which began Aug. 27 and closed Sept. 16, entitled shareholders to purchase shares at $265 each for every five “rights” they have, according to the filing.

Further, shares assigned to stockholders who choose not to participate in the offering could only be bought by Biglari, a move meant to further increase his stake in the company, Taylor said in his August motion.

Biglari owns about 19 percent of the company, according to publicly available data.

“The more control S. Biglari assumes over the company the more brazen he is in placing his own personal gain ahead of that of shareholders,” Taylor wrote in his motion for a preliminary injunction.

Evans rejected his motion in a Sept. 12 order, saying Taylor’s argument suffers from two “serious defects.”

His claim that Biglari wants to crowd out smaller shareholders to increase his stock ownership is nothing more than a prediction, she said. And Taylor’s argument contradicts the larger thrust of his complaint—that Biglari already dominates the company.

“If Biglari is already so firmly entrenched that the board moves at his whim, it is difficult to understand—as defendants point out—how the rights offering creates any new or distinct irreparable harm,” Barker wrote.

All five board members have professional ties to Biglari that extend outside their service on the board, including one who was a former professor of his, according to Taylor’s complaint.

Taylor’s motion for a preliminary injunction is part of a federal lawsuit he filed against Biglari and board directors in June in which he accuses them of gross mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty, as well as other charges.

The suit says they breached their fiduciary duty by allowing Biglari to engage in “self-serving transactions” by approving “inflated” compensation packages.

One of the transactions involves a licensing agreement that grants Biglari Holdings an exclusive license to use the name and mark “Biglari.” The license is royalty-free unless Biglari is terminated without cause or resigns involuntary. Then, Biglari is entitled to receive royalties from Biglari Holdings equal to 2.5 percent of the company’s annual revenue for a period no less than five years, according to the suit.

Also, Biglari’s total compensation package rose from $4.9 million in 2011 to $10.9 million last year, the complaint said.

Biglari became CEO of Indianapolis-based Steak n Shake in 2008, barely a year after he began buying shares of the burger chain.

Steak n Shake is operated by San Antonio-based Biglari Holdings. Its shares were down $2.13 Friday morning, to $425.12 each.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.