IBJNews

Biglari's revised incentive package approved by shareholders

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shareholders for Biglari Holdings Inc., Steak n Shake’s parent company, on Friday approved a revised, scaled-back incentive plan for Chairman and CEO Sardar Biglari.

The revised pay package pays Biglari the equivalent of 25 percent of the company’s annual growth in adjusted book value above a 6-percent threshold, up from 5 percent in the earlier version. The new deal also caps Biglari’s annual incentive pay at $10 million, but still requires him to spend at least 30 percent of his annual incentive payment buying Biglari Holdings shares in the open market.

A previously proposed incentive package for Biglari was criticized because it created the potential for Biglari to profit at shareholders’ expense. About 82 percent of the voting shares on Friday favored the revised proposal.

Biglari said there was “considerable misinformation” among shareholders about the earlier incentive agreement. Still, he agreed to revise the incentive package.

San Antonio-based Biglari Holdings Inc. canceled its previous shareholders meeting, scheduled for Aug. 24, to “correct misinformation,” answer questions from shareholders and analysts, and incorporate suggestions into an incentive package for Biglari.

Biglari Holdings cited a number of reasons for redesigning Biglari’s compensation, including his increased duties as a result of its transformation from strictly a restaurant company into a diversified holding company.

A September filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission says the company's annual goal for book-value growth is 10 percent. Based on a book value of $300 million, if the company achieved that 10 percent target, Biglari would earn an incentive bonus of $3 million. That is in addition to an annual salary of $900,000.

Friday’s shareholders meeting was the first held in San Antonio since Biglari moved the Steak n Shake parent’s headquarters there from Indianapolis earlier this year.

Biglari Holdings' subsidiaries are Steak n Shake, Western Sizzlin and Biglari Capital Corp.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Talk about greedy
    This is exactly the kind of greed that got our economy in so much trouble. Go to Texas and see if we care. Every Hoosier should boycott Steak n' Shake from now on -- why line the pockets of another Carl Icahn, especially when he thumbs his nose at one of the states that helped give him the opportunity to earn $3 million+ in annual bonuses??? DO NOT EAT AT STEAK N' SHAKE. Period. I hope every single IBJ reader will seriously consider this suggestion.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT