Bill to help some teachers repay loans advances

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Certain students who go on to teach science, math or special education in Indiana could get up to $9,000 to pay off loans if a legislative proposal becomes law.

Lawmakers on Thursday unanimously passed a measure to reward strong students who commit to teach science, technology, mathematics, education or special education. Teachers in areas with educator shortages also would qualify.

Students would get the money after their third year teaching in Indiana.

Only those who graduated in the top 20 percent of their high school class or score in the top 20 percent of ACT or SAT scores, and graduated college with at least a 3.5 grade-point average would be eligible for the loan reimbursement.

The measure now goes back to the Senate for final approval.


  • Why?
    What about teachers who have no loan? There's a lot of money in the administrative end...cut that, raise salaries. Finally, there's quite a well funded pension (thanks to the lottery). Of course with the Common Core Chaos...it will be impossible to draw people to teaching.
  • Idiot
    Mike: You think teachers have it so great? Why aren't you one? Mike needs to get his You need to get your facts straight. Teachers get 2 months off at most (and have to do continued education classes during that time to keep their licenses); work tons of hours each week during the school year when preparing lessons, doing paperwork and attending special events; get spit on, snotted on and bled on; feed and clothe kids and furnish supplies out of their own pockets; and never even get to go out to lunch. They do this because money is less important to them than children.
  • Know the Facts
    Teachers get paid for their 180 day school year, not year round. A starting teacher with a college degree will make less than $20/hr when it's all said and done. The $9K incentive isn't enough to convince any student that isn't already pursuing teaching to change based on the requirements (GPA, class rank, performance on ACT/SAT). Those top students will make more outside education.
  • Wow
    It must be nice to have the state pay back your loans...for teachers! They already get 4 months off per year, and now we're paying their loans! They get 2 weeks for Xmas, 1 week for Spring Break, 10 weeks for summer, 1 week for Fall Break, plus every other holiday off. Laborers and office workers get maybe 2, 3, or 4 weeks TOTAL per year off. Teachers should try working year round like the rest of us, instead of getting free money for working 8 months per year.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.