IBJNews

Bill would limit school referendum campaigns

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana school districts would face restrictions on how they campaign for referendums that would raise property taxes under a bill proposed by an Indianapolis lawmaker.

State Rep. Cindy Noe, R-Indianapolis, wants to stop schools from using public money and bar school employees from campaigning for the measures during school hours.

Noe says it's a matter of fairness, noting that opponents of such increases don't have access to contact information or tax dollars they can use to fight the proposals.

"Schools have phone lists of all the parents, while opponents might have to just pull names from the phone book," she said. "It's important to create a level playing field."

State law currently limits how school districts and other local governments can promote building projects that are up for referendum. Those seeking tax increases to pay teacher salaries and other operating expenses face fewer limitations, said Mary Jane Michalak, a spokeswoman for the Indiana Department of Local Government Finance.

Noe told the Daily Journal the same rules should apply no matter how the money will be used.

She said her bill would prevent schools from using taxpayer-funded resources, such as newsletters or automated phone systems, unless they gave opponents equal access to those facilities. Signs favoring a referendum campaign could not be placed on school property unless opponents also were allowed to put their signs at schools, Noe said.

Indiana University education center researcher Terry Spradlin, who helped lead a referendum in Johnson County's Center Grove schools, said he thinks the legislation is reasonable. Center Grove's $3.2 million referendum, which was intended to take the edge off of school funding shortfalls, was one of nine that voters rejected in November.

Noe noted that school administrators could still talk about why the district needs more tax funding while meeting with organized community groups or at speaking engagements.

Noe's bill has passed out of a committee and awaits consideration by the full House.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hypocrite
    Over 50% of referendums for schools have failed since the Daniels law was enacted. As a teacher, I can tell you I do not have time during my work day to work to support a referendum. However, if the state wants to continue to rip apart public education and strip every resource away possible as my average class size has jumped from 25-34 students int he last 5 years, I will fight back as hard as I possibly can to battle the anti-education representatives of this state. If that means writing personal letters to each of my parents asking them to support a referendum and hosting letter writing parties for teachers after schoo, then that is what will be done. It is unfortunate that so much time and resources will have to be taken away from my own personal time I used to use planning excellent lessons and communicating the progress of my students to their parents but someone in this state must stand up for public education. Then again, who needs engaging lessons when all the Bennett and the governor want are louse one size fits all scripted lessons read to students to help more pass a test that proves nothing other than adding a feather to eh cap of Governor Daniels and his national aspirations.
  • TAX DOLLARS SPENT WISELY
    THIS NEW LAW SHOULD INCLUDE ALL TYPES OF REFERENDUMS SUCH AS LIBRARY AND PARK COMMUNITY PROJECTS THAT ARE TAXPAYER FUNDED.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT