Bird gives glimpse at draft plan

June 22, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
birdLarry Bird, Indiana Pacers president of basketball operations, said the team has its eye on four players that can help the franchise right away if they’re available in the June 25 NBA draft.

“Three out of the four will be there, I guarantee that,” Bird told reporters at Conseco Fieldhouse this afternoon. “Whether we go point guard, big or wing, I think we’re going to get someone who can step right in and help us.”

If Bird had the pick of the litter, he said he’d take Connecticut center Hasheem Thabeet. But the big-man very unlikely to be available at No. 13. And Bird doubted the Pacers could afford to go after Thabeet, who is projected to go as high as No. 2.

More realistic selections, Bird said, would be Ohio State center B.J. Mullens, Pittsburgh power forward DeJuan Blair, North Carolina Ty Lawson and North Carolina power forward Tyler Hansbrough, who is projected to go between No. 18 and No. 20.

“They’ve picked on Tyler for four years, and all he’s done is won,” Bird said. “He plays hard every game, and I like those kinds of players.”

Bird added that people compare Hansbrough to current Pacers forward Jeff Foster, but he said Hansbrough shoots much better from the field and free throw line than Foster. Bird added that he likes players with experience.

“I don’t like one-year [college] players,” he said. “If I can have a three- or four-year player, I will.”

Bird said he’s also got a close eye on former Indiana University star Robert Vaden.

“He can shoot with any of them, and has lost a lot of weight,” Bird said. “We will look at [Vaden] with our second round pick.”

Bird will consult with Pacers' scouts and coaches, but said final draft day decisions will rest with him and David Morway, the team’s general manager.

After the draft is over, Bird expects there to be more roster changes, adding that he’d like to be active in free agency if possible. Once Pacers officials determine who they draft, then they’ll decide what to do with their own free agents, including point guard Jarrett Jack.

“We won’t have seven new faces like we did last year,” Bird said. “I can’t see us having any more than five new faces. But we could have five. We’re talking right now to some teams about some things.”
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Bird has made some good moves since taking over when Walsh left. The draft should be interesting.

    I still disagree with his handling of Tinsley. He basically wrote-off $21 mill when he announced that Tinsley would no longer be a Pacer and I doubt that he regained that amount at the box office or in the court of public opinion.
  • I agree, the Tinsley situation has got to be chalked up as a mistake, and Herb Simon deserves a measure of blame. He shouldn't have talked to the press about how Tinsley WAS NOT going to ever play again as a Pacer. His market value went through the floor at that point. I also question Bird's evaluation of Hasheem Thabeet. This guy has zero offense, and whoever puts him on the floor, will have to play teams 4 on 5 on the offensive end. That worries me a bit that Bird rates him so highly. But time will tell I suppose on Larry's legacy.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

  2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

  3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

  4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

  5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

ADVERTISEMENT