Bids pitch apartments, retail for former Fall Creek YMCA

December 7, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two bidders have submitted plans to redevelop the vacant former Fall Creek YMCA along West 10th Street with apartments and retail space. Both plans would result in demolition of the 50,500-square-foot building on roughly 2 acres at 860 W. 10th St. The Center Township Trustee, which bought the building in 2004 after the YMCA closed, sought bids for a mixed-use replacement in October. They were due Dec. 4. A bid from locally based Buckingham Co. suggests 210 luxury apartments, 11,000 square feet of retail and an 8,500-square-foot fitness center spread over four buildings. A second bid, from locally based Van Rooy Properties and several partners including REI  Real Estate Services, proposes a larger project that would include a redevelopment of the Van Rooy-owned Campus View Apartments to the east of the YMCA property. That proposal calls for 292 apartment units, 5,000 square feet of retail and 3,500 square feet of community and support space. The Trustee plans to work with each bidder to develop a best and final offer, said Phillip L. Bayt, a partner at local law firm Ice Miller LLP who represents the township. A decision is expected in early January. Bayt declined to disclose financial details in the bids. But the offering materials suggested a long-term lease with minimum annual rent of about $210,000, and an option to eventually buy the parcel for $2.9 million. No renderings yet, but stay tuned. An earlier post is here.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Go with Buckingham
    Despite having more units, Van Rooy's plans sound less ambitious. The Campus View land is even larger than the YMCA land, yet, with more than TWICE the total land, they're only proposing 82 more apartments and LESS retail.

    Let Buckingham develop the YMCA with more density and retail. From what I've heard, Van Rooy already had plans to redevelop the Campus View land in the future. That project should be even more attractive given Buckingham's plans for the YMCA site.
  • Community Redevelopment Agency?
    Why is the Center Twp Trustee buying and managing properties? If the government needs to be buying vacant properties, doesn't the city/county have a department charged with such tasks?
  • Good location
    Well which ever option is chosen, I'm sure they'll be able to fill a majority of these units with its proximity to IUPUI. If they build them tall enough, some of the units would have a great view of Fall Creek.
  • VAN ROOY!
    GO WITH VAN ROOY!!!! Anybody who knows what Campus Apartments are all about would be in FULL support to get rid of it. It is section 8 housing, that creates TONS of trouble in the area. If Buckingham were to get it, and build "luxery apartments" I sure would feel sorry for the folks that move there. Campus View Apartments is dragging that area down, and I commend Van Rooy for trying to do away with it and better that area of the city. How do you have "luxery apartments" right across the street from Sction 8 housing? What is Buckingham thinking?
  • Its called a city
    These weird little things called cities actually allow people with money to suffer the indignity of living near poor people. Its the suburbs you're thinking of.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT