Census surprises

January 4, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The 2010 census launches today, but details of the findings won’t be available until spring of 2011. Carol Rogers, an Indiana University demographer with a focus on the state, is watching for the following surprises:

— The Latino population in the Indianapolis area will be significantly larger than it was in the 2000 census, possibly 20 percent greater, Rogers says. In the past census, 2.7 percent of the region’s 1.5 million people were Latino. (In this example and the one below, the figures are for 2000 data accounting for the new Indianapolis-Carmel Metropolitan Statistical Area of Marion and surrounding counties along with Brown and Putnam counties.)

— Also in the Indianapolis area, homeownership rates will fall a few points from the 62.4 percent in 2000, Rogers predicts. Marion County, which has long had more renters due to the high number of college students and young people moving into the region, will see a surge in renters due to the foreclosure crisis.

— Head counts in densely populated unincorporated areas will jump. The place Rogers is watching most closely is Granger, a wealthy enclave outside South Bend that had exploded to 28,284 people as of the last census. People have moved to unincorporated areas—Fairland in Shelby County is one local example—to be able to afford more property. The residents also tend to want proximity to cities and their amenities while avoiding taxes for police and other services.

— Seymour, the city along Interstate 65 roughly halfway between Indianapolis and Louisville, probably has grown more than many people realize, Rogers says. Seymour had 18,101 residents during the last count, and has prospered largely through aggression of long-time economic development leader Jim Plump.

Thoughts on Rogers’ predictions?

How to you feel about participating in the census? Any hesitations?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Census Participation is Important
    I think that these predictions are on the money. Indiana will certainly see a significant rise in the Latino population, as will much of the country. I would add that we can expect to see that Indianaâ??s population has grown faster throughout the decade than neighboring Illinois, Michigan and Ohio thanks to a more dynamic economic landscape here.

    I donâ??t have any reservations about participating in the Census. The information determines Indianaâ??s representation in congress, the amount of federal funds we receive and provides important data for public service and economic development planning.
  • Census
    The US Census, appropriately conducted by the US Censless Bureau had much more direct benefit in regard to distribution of federal funds years ago. Congressional brokering, earmark bribes, and fattening of the congressional hogs should tell you that there is little chance anything will ever be fair unless we, the voters, find a way to change the way business is misconducted in Washington.

    The "change" we've seen did not live up to the promise of the "change" messiah. Remember the promise of NO MORE EARMARKS in my administration. Yeah, sure, buddy.

    And, oh, if we could only say NO to the CZARS. This is just wrong and has been a misdeed of both parties just as both are to blame for the mess we are enduring in Congress.

    Oink, oink...........
  • Ovbious
    the information which will come out in the 2010 census - should not be a surprise. More people in the state, Less home owners, more renters. Race, Politics, Religion, and Professional shifts in various areas. If you have been awake the past 10 or so years, there should not be much of a supprise or shock.

    My question is, how long and how often do people hold houses (especially within the past 10 years)? I knew a few people who moved about 2-4 times within the last ten years and this is not completely due to the current crisis, but due to the fact of job changes, educational changes, or other personal reasons.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT