IU down to final four?

April 1, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IUpregameAs the NCAA hoops tournament heads down the home stretch, Indiana University appears to have its own final four—for its vacant men’s basketball coaching job. But there are a few Cinderellas that could crash this party. A week from now, IU officials said, fans and alumni should know who will lead the team next season.

Sources within the university and close to college basketball say IU’s 10-person search committee has zeroed in on four primary candidates; Xavier’s Sean Miller, Wright State’s Brad Brownell, Louisville’s Rick Pitino and former Stanford and Golden State coach Mike Montgomery.

Each has strengths and weaknesses. Miller and Brownell, both 39, are up-and-coming coaches that IU could build a program around. They’ve both been successful, Miller compiling a 93-39 record and Brownell 127-62. But neither has experience at a marquee program.

Pitino, 55, and Montgomery, 61, have big-time experience, but some within IU think those candidates will retire within 10 to 12 years. Pitino and Miller have buyout clauses in their current contracts estimated at $2 million. Montgomery, currently an assistant to the Stanford athletic director, would be the easiest—and probably most affordable—to hire.

Given IU’s $45 million athletic department budget, which is small by Big Ten standards, a $2 million buyout plus a $2 million annual salary that Pitino would request might put him out of the picture. IU’s budget would also mean that Miller would have to agree to a contract that is backloaded to pay him more in the later years and less in the early years while they absorb his buyout.

Two candidates who are definitely out are Washington State’s Tony Bennett and New Mexico’s Steve Alford. Long-time fan favorite Alford this week signed an extension to lead the Lobos through the 2015-16 season. New Mexico officials gave Alford a 25-percent raise to scare off IU’s search committee, sources said.

No competition is complete without a couple dark horses. Virginia Commonwealth’s Anthony Grant, 42, is the strongest contender, but Butler’s Brad Stevens, 31, is also getting some interest.

Stevens’ buyout clause would be peanuts for IU, he knows Indiana and has shown the ability to recruit. He’s certainly a guy IU could lock down for 25-plus years.

After spending 10 years as Billy Donovan’s assistant coach at Florida, Grant has been solid in two seasons at VCU.

If all else fails, retaining Dan Dakich still isn’t out of the question. While some sources believe he could be successful with his own players at IU, his 3-4 record as the head man at his alma matter makes him the darkest horse of all.

IU trustees and members of the search committee will only say the goal is to have the new coach in place in one week. And remember, two years ago, Kelvin Sampson came out of nowhere to land the job.

“There's a lot of speculation that’s not based on fact,” Indiana University Trustees President Stephen Ferguson said.

Who do you think is the best choice to be IU basketball coach?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • You know, I read this article then over at the Indy Star site I read how Dakich just kicked two guys off the team, apparently because of their bad attitudes. Was this NOT a decision that should have been left to the new coach, especially since the coach should be chosen by next week? Sounds to me like a decision which, coupled with his rather poor performance leading the team at the end of the season, will all but assure that HE is not the one chosen. Bad, bad decision on his part if you ask me....
  • Why would Rick Pitino want to coach at IU?
  • This IU gig is about more than coaching. The right guy, someone like Pitino, would be involved in historic developments at IU with all the capital projects planned. You'd be crazy if you didn't think a guy like Pitino or just about any other Div. I coach with ambition wouldn't want to be involved with helping direct such a project. And if you help put a winner on the floor and raise the money to raise the roof ... you could find yourself with your name on a building ... or a court at the very least. You don't think Dean Smith smiles every time someone mentions the Dean Dome at UNC. That's the sort of thing that draws guys like Pitino to the table.
  • Tom Crean!!!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT