IRL innovation a life saver

April 7, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
mcdowellNASCAR rookie Michael McDowell owes Indy Racing League leaders—and especially Tony George—a measure of gratitude.

If not for research funded by the IRL and George, and led by the University of Nebraska, McDowell, 23, could well be dead today.

Friday, McDowell plowed into turn one at Texas Motor Speedway while one his second NASCAR Sprint Cup qualifying lap there.

But the turning point for McDowell’s near death experience likely came in May, 2002. That’s when George decided not to charge other race tracks a licensing fee for the SAFER—Steel and Foam Energy Reduction—barrier technology that padded McDowell’s impact Friday. That move, motorsports business experts said, cost George millions of dollars.

Replays of McDowell’s crash show the wall moving inward several feet as it absorbs the blow. It was still a horrific crash, with McDowell’s car flipping at least eight times.

Eddie Gossage, as the Texas Motor Speedway general manager, was one of the first to jump on the SAFER barriers band wagon.

“This is a big, big step,” Gossage said in 2002, shortly after SAFER barriers were introduced. “Not only could this save lives, it could save teams a lot of resources in crashes. We definitely have interest in this, and I think most other tracks will too.”

While Gossage’s prophesy about saving lives might well have come true, he was wrong about most other tracks having immediate interest. Eventually, safety won out over ignorance and an unwillingness to spend money to have the walls installed. In 2002, it cost a super speedway about $750,000 to install SAFER barriers. A licensing fee would have likely caused some track officials nationwide to drag their feet even more on installation.

It’s difficult to say how many lives the SAFER barriers have saved. Racing experts said the lives saved, like the money George could have made off the technology, is a big number.

“There are more than 1,200 short tracks in this country alone,” said Dick Berggren, long-time Speedway Illustrated editor and retired racer. “Tony George spent a lot of money on this and you can begin to see the revenue he's walking away from. The development of this was not easy.”

“If there’s a Nobel Prize for this sort of thing,” Gossage said in 2002, “Tony George should get it.”
ADVERTISEMENT
  • For all those who have trumpeted the negatives about TG's decision regarding the future of racing (in particular the IRL), keep in mind the tremendous benefactor that he has become with issues like this. Tony has a passion for the sport, but more importantly a lot of heart and caring about the individuals that drive the cars. Thank you, Tony, for your compassion.

    Wouldn't we like to see just one politician put principle before money?
  • I say amen to that-TG has helped racing safety. But TG could sell the tech to highway depts. And I think that has been looked into.
  • It is funny how the TG haters ignore things like this. The licensing fees alone could have paid for the IRL for years. Kudos to TG for doing the right thing and not patting himself on the back for it. Ironically he needs national recognition for what he has done for the industry.
  • This is a good point.
  • Good point
  • good point.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT