Indians stock takes hit

January 23, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
rowdieDespite year-over-year revenue gains and robust earnings, it appears the economy might have finally caught up with the Indianapolis Indians. For years, this AAA baseball franchise has steamed along with solid attendance and $1 million plus annual profits. Profits for 2008 were $1.23 million.

But now, stock brokers making a market in Indians stock are showing less confidence in this franchise’s thinly traded stock. The franchise too, has pulled back the reins on its stock buyback offer. While the Indians board reduced its stock buyback price from the $21,832 per share it offered last year to $21,328 it's offering this year, market makers are pulling back much harder.

Even though the stock has traded at a 52-week high of $25,000 and a 52-week low of $23,250, market makers are currently only offering between $17,500 and $17,250 per share. Since there are 767 outstanding shares remaining, that puts a paltry price tag of $13.4 million on the entire franchise. The team's buyback offer price puts a $16.4 million value on the franchise.

Two factors would seem to put Indians stock in strong favor. First, the team has been a consistent financial winner, despite economic downturns. This coming season will no doubt be a stern test. Second, since the franchise is retiring all shares it acquires, it would stand to reason that the value of the remaining shares would increase since they become a larger slice of the pie.

Sports business experts said when market and consumer confidence returns, the team’s value will be at least $25 million, putting the share price at more than $32,500. Until then, the market makers are likely to continue their low ball offers.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I think the stock is still worth an easy $25,000 per share from what I've seen of the financials. Interestingly, Forbes just put out a report about how many pro franchise values are over-estimated. But I still think the Indians is a very solid buy, certainly at $21,000 or $22,000.
  • No wonder the stock is taking a hit... if the guy in the picture is the CFO, they won't last the summer.
  • Anyone look at their 401K lately? Doesn't seem to hard to believe the stock of the Indians is falling like every other one.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT