Indianapolis dodges bullet in small-biz study

July 15, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Those of us living in the industrial Midwest are accustomed to wincing before we crack open labor market studies.

But that wasn’t necessary for a new look at the smallest businesses in the nation’s 50 largest markets. Indianapolis, the only Indiana metro large enough to be lumped into Kiva and Visa's "Small Business Trouble Spots," didn't even come in for a mention. The study ranked changes in the number of businesses with fewer than 10 employees, and there was plenty of carnage all around Indianapolis.

Two Interstate 70 peers, Kansas City and Columbus, lost 2 percent of those smallest businesses between 2006 and 2008. (The recession started in December 2007 and ended in June 2009.) Cincinnati, Cleveland, Detroit, Louisville, Milwaukee, Memphis and St. Louis all lost at least 1 percent of those businesses.

It wasn’t as if Indianapolis thrived during that stretch. The overall number of jobs barely held steady. But treading water was enough to make the area something of an island.

What’s your perception of Indianapolis as a place for small companies to do business? It’s long been considered particularly stable due to the presence of state government and its diversified economy. Indianapolis doesn’t experience big upsides, but neither does it suffer huge declines.

If you weren’t doing business here, where would you rather be?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

  2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

ADVERTISEMENT