Is it really veteran-owned?

July 29, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Too many small-business owners are claiming status as veterans or disabled vets, the Army Times reports, so the Veterans Affairs Department is investigating.

The problem is big. More than three-quarters of businesses claiming the status were problematic, the government said, with an initial check suggesting at least 1,400 businesses falsely received more than $500 million in contracts set aside for vets.

The main problem is contracts subbed out to non-veterans. But other issues were uncovered, like a “disabled” vet who was discharged from the Marines after being injured in a football game. He served for a mere five weeks.

New verification systems might be helping, but the department won’t know more until it digs deeper.

How do you feel about set-aside policies like veteran-owned companies, or minority- and women-owned companies? Are fraud or even simply misunderstandings as rampant as the Veteran Affairs probe suggests?
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Indiana is NOT Veteran Friendly
    I don't doubt that there's a problem - especially with so many Federal contracts in the works. However, we don't have legislation in Indiana that builds a preference to Veteran-owned businesses. It's so bad, in fact, that Vetrepreneur magazine has called Indiana 'totally vetrepreneur-unfriendly'. I would encourage businesses to verify the business through NaVOBA (http://www.navoba.com/). And I'd encourage IBJ to do a story on how Indiana doesn't give any preference to Veteran-owned small businesses.
    • Gov't contract for DAVs
      Can you tell me where to sign up for small business DAV contracts for services I offer.

      Thank you,
      Bob
    • an actual vet
      I am a vet currently in Iraq I have been looking for jobs that are vet friendly in Indianapolis for weeks now and I can't find one. I feel ashamed that the city I love can't even help me get a job in the country myself and my wife protected in war torn counrties more then once.
    • Wife of veteran-business owner
      As a wife of a veteran who owns his own security company here in Indianapolis, it saddens me that people would actually claim their business was veteran-owned when that is not necessarily case. My husband was in the US Marines for 8 years, and once his contract was up he was honorably discharged with one Iraq tour under his belt. Since he was trained in electronics and had experience overseas, he felt a calling to continue protecting his fellow America’s on the home front, which lead to starting Morrison Fire & Security. In his third year of business providing residential and commercial security systems, camera systems, etc to all of greater Indiana- he finds his main competition being the larger national companies. To hear that his competition becomes even more difficult because some people are falsely claiming their business is vet-owned, is shameful. I say this not only because of the dishonesty, but more because it’s a disgrace to those who have nobly served years in the military and put themselves in harm’s way while overseas. I hope that a system is created to rectify this situation of falsely listed businesses because I know that my husband is one of those veteran’s whose businesses is affected by those committing fraud by falsely listing their business as veteran-owned.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

    2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

    3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

    4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

    5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

    ADVERTISEMENT