Local researcher puts price tag on college football programs

October 7, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Normally, doctoral dissertations aren’t my idea of a fascinating read.

But an Indiana researcher released to IBJ a new study on college football that I think sports business experts, college administrators and fans alike will find riveting.

The researcher used his skills as a valuation analyst to value football programs as if they were stand-alone businesses that could be bought and sold on the open market.

I spent the last two weeks pouring over the 242-page study, and there is an in-depth story on its findings and the man behind it in the Oct. 10 print edition. For those with online subscriptions, the story will be available at IBJ.com on Saturday.

The researcher hopes the study will help athletic directors and college presidents make better investment and payroll decisions. He said knowing the valuation of a college football program, considering discounted cash flow models and myriad other factors, is more helpful in predicting a program’s financials than merely looking at revenue history.

He also thinks his model could help value other not-for-profits.

Forbes magazine has attempted to value professional sports franchises for more than a decade, but only recently tried to do likewise for a handful of college programs.

As far as I can tell, the locally-generated study is far more in-depth than any other study on the business of college football, giving values of the 100 biggest public college football programs.

The study ranked only public schools because the researcher used financial data required of public schools by the U.S. Department of Education. It valued IU’s program $22.4 million higher than Purdue’s.

Notably missing from the list are private schools such as Notre Dame and Southern Cal. But the researcher has some interesting thoughts on those schools, as well.

The researcher’s background is as interesting as the study. The 42-year-old earned two undergraduate degrees from Purdue, then an MBA and a doctorate from IU. But he’s not a life-long academic.

For seven years, he worked in management focusing on engineering and environmental risk management for AlliedSignal Corp. and United Technologies Corp.

As a business analyst for United Technologies and later as a consultant for Houlihan Valuation Advisors, he accrued 11 years’ experience as a valuation analyst. He has been an expert witness on valuation analysis in several state and federal court cases.

There’s more interesting sports business data in the study than I could possibly fit into one article. But the article includes a partial list of top-valued Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly known as NCAA D-IA) programs.

So who’s No. 1?

Texas.

By a wide margin.

The study concludes that if the Longhorn football program were run as a stand-alone business and sold, it would go for $848.27 million.

For more on the study and to learn the identity of the researcher, you’ll have to check out the upcoming IBJ.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT