Review: Bloomington Playwrights Project's 'The Truman Show' musical

February 9, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

I love the fact that Bloomington Playwrights Project has gotten into the brutally difficult business of incubating new musicals.

Crafting such a show isn't just about writing a good tunestack to go with solid source material. As with a child, a musical has to find its voice--not the voice of its individual creators but a voice of its own. And that voice doesn't always come with its birth, but can transform as it finds its feet.

I missed "Kissing Frogs," the musical crafted by IU alumni Schonfeld and Nicole Parker (she of "Mad TV" note) that took early steps at BPP in 2011. So I didn't want to miss Alex Gemignani and Brad Bauner's "The Truman Show," the latest BPP-produced new musical (Feb. 1-10). 

Famliarity with the material seems to be assumed: Even the show's poster isn't worried about spoiler prevention. As those who have seen the film know, Truman is a man raised from birth in an elaborate, live reality show. The rub is that he isn't aware of it, naively buying into his world as the real thing. But cracks begin to show, not everyone in his universe buys into the morality of this manipulation, and Truman begins to believe that his life isn't as real as he once thought. 

The movie requires an enormous suspension of disbelief (even these days with TV shows getting closer and closer to this kind of audience indulgence). The musical needs even more--and not just because, in this production, the roles, regardless of age, are played by college students).

Yes, we accept characters stepping out of reality in conventional musicals to belt out a telling tune and perform choreographed dance routines. But the musical numbers we see on stage aren't really a part of Truman's reality or the reality of the unreal real characters in his life. They are musical conventions and they muddy the lines in a story that, at its core, is anchored in the subtle differences between one reality and another. 

One strong sign of hope for the material lies in in a second act song where the manipulative show producer sings instructions to the earpiece of one of Truman's "friends" and that character sings them to Truman. It's a unique duet that gives the show musical layers that don't exist elsewhere, despite the earnestness of the production.

As it stands, though, the big leap--the kind that led the "Wicked" and "Les Miserables" creative team to throw out most of their source material--hasn't been made. As represented here, the show stands, wobbly, in the camp with "The Wedding Singer" and "9 to 5"--adaptations that aren't quite sure, theatrically, why they've been adapted to this form. 

Driving back to Indy, I couldn't help but wonder what would happen if Truman's "show" actually did feature choreographed dances, if his fake-life frinds did sing balads, and if his neighbords greeted him musically every morning. What would happen if that was the reality this guy grew up with, believing from a young age that people sing and dance their feelings. Wouldn't is reality include trying to find his own musical voice in order to fit in?

Now that might be a musical. 

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT