IU's Assembly Hall could get new name if price is right

February 27, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana University basketball program is on a roll (Tuesday night’s loss notwithstanding), and Fred Glass, the school’s athletic director, is looking for ways to turn the region’s red-hot fervor for IU basketball into some long green.

IU alums and supporters might be surprised by what Glass is willing to consider to raise some cash. It’s not that nothing is sacred. In fact, Glass completely dismissed the idea of putting a corporate logo on the Assembly Hall court.

“That wouldn’t feel right,” Glass said. “The court is sacrosanct.”

The name on the building? Not so much.

Glass said if someone came forward with a large enough donation, he’d consider a naming rights deal for the 42-year old basketball venue on the north edge of IU’s Bloomington campus.

He’d be less wild about a corporate moniker on the facility and more open to putting an individual or family name on it. But it’s clear, in terms of renaming the house where three national championship teams played, that nothing is off the table. Assembly Hall, he said, could remain in the name.

There’s no naming rights deal pending, Glass said. But IU officials are certainly pondering the idea. And with good reason.

Carmel-based Conseco Inc. in 1999 paid $40 million for a 20-year naming rights deal for the Indiana Pacers’ home venue. In 2008, California-based Lucas Oil Products paid the Indianapolis Colts $121.5 million for a 20-year deal to put its name on the team’s new stadium.

The Colts and Pacers were hot commodities with fans and sponsors when they signed their deals, like IU is now. While sports marketers don’t think IU could command the type of money the Colts scored, they think the school could easily bank $20 million for a 10-year deal.

Anyone who watches IU basketball on television knows that ESPN’s Dick Vitale screams that Assembly Hall should be named for former coach Bob Knight. While Glass didn’t dismiss the notion of some rich alum paying a lot of money to put Knight’s name on the building, momentum for that possibility may be fading. A handful of big IU donors I talked to last week for a recent IBJ print story discouraged the idea.

Part of that reluctance is certainly due to the success the program has had under coach Tom Crean. But Knight hasn’t helped himself with some of his most ardent fans from years past. He has refused to take hold of the olive branch continually extended by Glass, declined to come to a ceremony where he was inducted into the IU Athletics Hall of Fame, and until late last year refused to even utter Indiana’s name on ESPN, where he works as an analyst.

The straw that broke the back of some IU followers was Knight’s appearance this month on a video played during The Ohio State University’s home game against IU. Knight is an OSU alum, but many IU backers viewed the video as a low blow.

“I used to coach a little bit, and there's nothing better than Ohio State basketball,” Knight said in the clip, which earned a roar from the OSU crowd.

“Knight was a great coach who graduated his players and I admire him for that,” said Bart Kaufman, an IU alum and former baseball player who is also a major donor to the school’s athletic program. “But the depth of his being a jerk has worn on alums. In the end, his approach eroded his brand and that of IU.”

For his part, Glass is looking forward, not back.

Glass is already realizing the riches from IU’s current two-year run of hardwood success. Through mid-February, IU merchandise sales were up 31 percent over the same period last season. Last year, IU saw a 15-percent revenue increase from the sale of its licensed goods.

Last season, IU snapped a three-year streak of substandard play and made it to the Sweet 16 of the NCAA tournament. This year, IU is leading the Big Ten and has spent several weeks ranked No. 1 nationally. It’s almost hard to remember IU was 6-25 just five years ago—during Crean’s first year.

Glass says student season ticket sales are at an all-time high this year (13,000 packages), and, yes, that includes the glory days when Knight led the Hoosiers to three national championships in 12 seasons.

“Things are as crazy down here as I’ve ever seen,” said Glass, who graduated in 1981, the year IU won its second NCAA title under Knight.

Support coming from alumni and program supporters – and that’s the kind of support that pays the bills – is also rising. That’s the biggest barometer of all.Giving to the IU Varsity Club rose from $7.9 million in 2011 to $9.1 million in 2012. With giving to the Varsity Club up 21.7 percent so far this year, that take is set to approach $11 million.

But there’s still more to be made, said Indianapolis sports marketer David Morton.

“Any good salesman in their position would look for new inventory to sell,” Morton said. “In this changing era of marketing, it’s time they start thinking differently.”

I think Glass already is.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • name the new one
    they should name the new one after they tear down Assembly Hall.
  • Assembly Hall Name
    There is one and only one name to name the new Assembly Hall and that is "Bobby Knight Fieldhouse/Arena" etc...
  • Assembly Hall
    Hey Rick, Classy comments.
  • Ready for new name
    I think the public is ready for such a naming rights deal. They realize college sports is big biz, and it takes big money to succeed. But in the near term, Assembly Hall needs to go.
  • no
    No no no no no no no no no
  • Assembly Hall
    Coach Knight had the best renaming idea....after his friend.....Ben Dozer

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT