Crowdfunding startup ready to make connections

February 27, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Securities and Exchange Commission is still drafting its rules for crowdfunding—a provision in last year’s Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act that allows private companies to raise capital by lining up large numbers of small investors.

That delay is good news for the founders of LocalStake, an Indianapolis-based Web startup that is using an exemption in existing securities laws to arrange private offerings while others wait on the guidelines. (Read my July story here.)

"It keeps competition further away,” said Kevin Hitchen, who launched the company last year with partners Ryan Flynn and Brandon Smith.

Donation-based crowdfunding has exploded in recent years as sites like Kickstarter allow users to support creative projects with small gifts. Adding equity to the equation adds layers of complication that LocalStake aims to unravel.

As a registered broker-dealer, LocalStake is set to connect investors with businesses in their communities that need cash.

About 90 companies have applied for funding through LocalStake, but only two are listed as “potential offerings” on its online marketplace. Another five are in the process of being approved.

“We are being very selective about who we deal with,” Flynn said.

Although securities laws prevent them from discussing the companies they’re working with, the partners said they want to offer investors a range of options: startups and growing businesses, for example, in a range of industries.

Registered users can see the basics on the companies seeking funding. On LocalStake right now: A startup Bloomington craft distillery looking for $500,000 and an established Anderson pet treats maker that wants $150,000.

Users with LocalStake investment accounts can request additional information, including the offering materials filed with federal and state regulators.

By the end of the year, the partners expect to have helped more than a dozen companies secure capital. They also want the experience to be positive for the 650-plus investor-users who already have signed on.

“They are our real customers,” Flynn said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT