Critics conference journal #2: Content and context discussed by out-of-towners

March 22, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Over late dinner, the discussions were lively at every table at Ralston's Drafthouse.

That's where those in town for the American Theatre Critics Association conference gathered for a post-show meal after attending their first Indianapolis play, "The Lyons" at the Phoenix Theatre.

These folks don't just talk about the content of plays, they talk about the context. How does it differ seeing a show early in the run (when critics are usually invited) rather than late in the run (as we did this time)? How do we approach performances differently when we've seen the actors in many other roles (as, in this case, I have but they haven't)? How much should the size and shape of a theater space affect the tone of a performance ("The Lyons" is in the downstairs Basile Theatre)?

There was also talk beyond theater with those who arrived in Indy early, making the others jealous as they shared their experiences at The Children's Museum of Indianapolis, the Indianapolis Museum of Art, the Indiana War Memorial and elsewhere. 

There may be some misconceptions, too. After spending time at the conference hotel, the Alexander, and experiencing a welcoming reception at the Conrad Indianapolis, they might be under the mistaken belief that every hotel in Indy is packed with impressive original art.

Today, we spend quality time at the Indiana History Society for tours and panels (the public is invited to a "Why the Midwest?" panel at 1 p.m.), then it's off to the Vonnegut Library, the Indiana Repertory Theatre (for a sample of Dance Kaleidoscope's "Piaf Plus" and a full performance of "The Whpping Man") and the Cabaret at the Columbia Club.

Follow tweets at #indyatca13.

Your thoughts?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT