Prime Zionsville land inching toward development

April 23, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After several delays, Zionsville officials are working toward a late-May deadline for wrapping up a complicated plan to buy 91.3 acres of land from Dow Chemical Co.—clearing the way for commercial development worth an estimated $55 million.

Zionsville Community Schools and the town of Zionsville are collaborating on the deal, which has changed in scope since it was announced last year due to environmental concerns on a portion of the original 126-acre property.

The purchase price dropped along with the size of the project, from $5.7 million to $3.2 million.

If the deal goes through, the school district will use money from a 2005 bond issue to pay for the property, keeping almost nine acres for storage and maintenance operations. The town would take title to the rest of the land that straddles 106th Street east of Zionsville Road, making annual payments to the schools through 2028.

Once the town installs underground utilities, Indianapolis-based Rockland Development LLC would begin developing the site. Rockland principal Paul Kite expects the first 86,400-square-foot commercial building to be complete in 2015, to be followed by five more structures over the next five years.

“We’ve been working as a group on putting something together on the Dow site since 2007,” Kite, a veteran local real estate developer, told the Zionsville Redevelopment Commission on Monday night. “Our intent is to see the property developed in a sensible and positive way for the town.”

Rockland struck the original land deal with Dow, then offered the purchase rights to the town in exchange for an exclusive development agreement. Residents at the Monday meeting asked Kite why he didn’t buy the property himself.

“I wish I could have,” he said. But in the current real estate environment, “no one can buy land for speculative development anymore.”

Kite said he already has heard from potential users of the site, which Dow was unwilling to sell piecemeal. He expects to focus on developing office space, with the goal of attracting corporate headquarters, high-tech and biomedical uses.

“We’re trying to increase the daytime population of the Village,” he said, referring to the town’s retail-oriented central business district. “It will only benefit the town economically.”

A preliminary assessment shows the property was in use as far back as 1913, when Pitman-Moore Co. had a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility there. Dow bought it in 1960 and used the plant to make human and veterinary vaccines until 1976. Buildings on the site were gone by 1989, and in the mid-1990s Dow entered a voluntary remediation program to resolve some lingering environmental issues.

State regulators signed off on a portion of the remediation in 2005, clearing the land that is part of the Zionsville deal. Remediation is still under way in the portion of the property excluded from the sale.

Results of a more-thorough environmental study are expected to be made public in advance of the Redevelopment Commission’s next meeting April 29.


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...