Book offers lessons from 'magnetic' Fishers museum

May 6, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Conner Prairie’s focus on experiential learning has boosted attendance and drawn financial support from the likes of the National Science Foundation.

Now the Fishers living-history museum is one of six “magnetic” institutions featured in a new book that aims to identify the qualities that allow some organizations to thrive, rather than simply survive.

Written by national museum thought leaders Anne Bergeron and Beth Tuttle, “Magnetic: The Art and Science of Engagement” is being likened to Jim Collins’ corporate-focused “Good to Great.”

The authors spent more than three years analyzing data, observing operations and interviewing stakeholders for the book. The other featured museums: Children’s Museum Pittsburgh; the Chrysler Museum of Art in Norfolk, Va.; The Franklin Institute in Philadelphia; Natural Science Center of Greensboro, N.C. (now Greensboro Science Center); and Philbrook Museum of Art in Tulsa, Okla.

“It is really gratifying to be included,” said Ellen Rosenthal, CEO of Conner Prairie Interactive History Park.

The museum community has taken notice of Conner Prairie’s work to draw visitors and supporters following a years-long governance dispute that left both on short supply. In the six years since then, attendance has more than doubled, Rosenthal said.

More than 235,000 people visited the museum or took part in Conner Prairie programs last year, and the organization received more than $1.7 million in gifts and sponsorships.

Rosenthal credits the museum’s “Opening Doors” initiative, which took a research-based approach to customer service. Studying how visitors responded to various activities helped Conner Prairie come up with strategies to better engage its guests.

“That created what we have now, which is a ‘choose your own adventure’ kind of experience,” Rosenthal said.

Staff members have embraced the idea and carried it forward, she said. Conner Prairie’s Animal Encounters program, for example, became a lot more interactive after the breeding schedule was tweaked to produce lambs when the museum grounds are open to the public. (Sticking to the “historically accurate” breeding season meant lambs were born in March, Rosenthal said.)

“The staff understands it’s in their hands to understand how to engage people,” she said. “It’s very ingrained in our culture now. It has a life of its own. One of our board members calls it our ‘special sauce.’”

That’s exactly what the “Magnetic” authors were looking for when they set out to examine successful museums and share the lessons learned with other mission-driven organizations.

“This book shares the stories of museums that have experienced superior business results by virtue of turning up the emotional heat, tapping into the power of creating meaning, and purposefully becoming more relevant to their communities,” said Tuttle, CEO of the Pennsylvania-based Cultural Data Project, in a written statement. “Because all organizations need people to accomplish their goals, we believe that every for-profit or nonprofit business can learn lessons from these magnetic museums.”


Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?