Book offers lessons from 'magnetic' Fishers museum

May 6, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Conner Prairie’s focus on experiential learning has boosted attendance and drawn financial support from the likes of the National Science Foundation.

Now the Fishers living-history museum is one of six “magnetic” institutions featured in a new book that aims to identify the qualities that allow some organizations to thrive, rather than simply survive.

Written by national museum thought leaders Anne Bergeron and Beth Tuttle, “Magnetic: The Art and Science of Engagement” is being likened to Jim Collins’ corporate-focused “Good to Great.”

The authors spent more than three years analyzing data, observing operations and interviewing stakeholders for the book. The other featured museums: Children’s Museum Pittsburgh; the Chrysler Museum of Art in Norfolk, Va.; The Franklin Institute in Philadelphia; Natural Science Center of Greensboro, N.C. (now Greensboro Science Center); and Philbrook Museum of Art in Tulsa, Okla.

“It is really gratifying to be included,” said Ellen Rosenthal, CEO of Conner Prairie Interactive History Park.

The museum community has taken notice of Conner Prairie’s work to draw visitors and supporters following a years-long governance dispute that left both on short supply. In the six years since then, attendance has more than doubled, Rosenthal said.

More than 235,000 people visited the museum or took part in Conner Prairie programs last year, and the organization received more than $1.7 million in gifts and sponsorships.

Rosenthal credits the museum’s “Opening Doors” initiative, which took a research-based approach to customer service. Studying how visitors responded to various activities helped Conner Prairie come up with strategies to better engage its guests.

“That created what we have now, which is a ‘choose your own adventure’ kind of experience,” Rosenthal said.

Staff members have embraced the idea and carried it forward, she said. Conner Prairie’s Animal Encounters program, for example, became a lot more interactive after the breeding schedule was tweaked to produce lambs when the museum grounds are open to the public. (Sticking to the “historically accurate” breeding season meant lambs were born in March, Rosenthal said.)

“The staff understands it’s in their hands to understand how to engage people,” she said. “It’s very ingrained in our culture now. It has a life of its own. One of our board members calls it our ‘special sauce.’”

That’s exactly what the “Magnetic” authors were looking for when they set out to examine successful museums and share the lessons learned with other mission-driven organizations.

“This book shares the stories of museums that have experienced superior business results by virtue of turning up the emotional heat, tapping into the power of creating meaning, and purposefully becoming more relevant to their communities,” said Tuttle, CEO of the Pennsylvania-based Cultural Data Project, in a written statement. “Because all organizations need people to accomplish their goals, we believe that every for-profit or nonprofit business can learn lessons from these magnetic museums.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT