Pacers fans thump Knicks boosters in TV ratings

May 8, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Pacers KnicksIndiana Pacers fans are watching their team on television in big numbers this postseason—even bigger numbers than last year.

The Indianapolis market scored the highest nationwide rating for game one on Sunday, according to New York-based Nielsen Media Research.

The game, which aired locally on ABC affiliate WRTV-TV Channel 6, registered an average rating of 14.4 and a 24 share, which means almost a quarter of the market was watching. At its peak in the fourth quarter, almost 200,000 central Indiana households tuned in, representing nearly 30 percent of the market.

WABC-TV in New York, home of the Knicks, scored a 9.1 rating and 19 share for Sunday’s game one.

Despite its lower rating, more than three times as many TV households in the New York City area (close to 700,000) watched game one than did those in central Indiana. They probably didn’t like what they saw, as the No. 3 seeded Pacers defeated the No. 2 seeded Knicks in New York.

Tuesday’s game two on TNT scored a 7.23 rating in the Indianapolis market. It would have been much higher had the Pacers not tanked in the fourth quarter. Early on the rating was 9.26 and spiked at 9.75 in the third and early fourth quarter, according to Nielsen. Then the wheels fell off the Pacers and the rating fell to 4.72 late in the fourth quarter.

Last year, the rating for game one in the second round against Miami was 11.7 and game two was a 9.5. Game one against the Heat last year was played on a Sunday on ABC and game two was played on a Tuesday on TNT.

This year’s average rating for the second round is 2.1 percent higher than last year, and again, would have been much higher had the Pacers not got blown out by 26 points in game two Tuesday night at Madison Square Garden.

The Sunday game this year easily made WRTV the local ratings winner. During the heart of the Pacers game from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., the next-highest rating was WXIN-TV Channel 59, which was airing Fox’s NASCAR race coverage.

Local NASCAR fans clearly were switching over to the Pacers game. The NASCAR race was pulling an 11.78 rating in this market shortly before the Pacers and Knicks tipped off, then dipped into single digits after the game began. WXIN’s ratings fell all the way to 4.47 during the heat of the game, then rebounded to 12.99 after it ended.

Indianapolis is usually one of the top three markets for NASCAR telecasts, and is often No. 2 behind Charlotte, N.C., where the series is headquartered.

While the Pacers game was airing on WRTV, WISH-TV Channel 8 was scoring ratings of 2.0 to 4.4 with CBS’ coverage of the PGA Tour. WTHR-TV Channel 13 was stuck below 1.0 with NBC’s coverage of the National Hockey League playoffs.

WRTV isn’t the only station smiling about the Pacers’ playoff success. According to Nielsen, the ratings of round one games versus Atlanta that aired on Fox Sports Indiana were up 15 percent over round one games last year on the network.

Round one games last year against Orlando earned a 5.49 rating while the Pacers-Atlanta games this year on Fox Sports Indiana scored 6.34. That means about 68,000 central Indiana homes on average tuned in.

Momentum this year is spilling into anticipation for next year, Fox Sports Indiana officials said, and several sponsor deals for the 2013-14 season have already been signed.

“We’re pleased with the momentum and excitement,” said Fox Sports spokesman David Pokorny. “The fans are engaged and really interested, and our sales staff is hearing quite a bit of buzz.”

With tip time for game three of the Pacers-Knicks series in Indianapolis set for 8 p.m. Saturday and with the game airing on ABC (WRTV), ratings will likely return to strong double-digits.

Photo: Associated Press
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • NASCAR
    Fans switched over from NASCAR because there was a massive weather delay. Overall, NASCAR ratings are as high as they've ever been in this market. That said, go Pacers!
  • NASCAR RACE ???
    DID YOU FAIL TO MENTION THE NASCAR RACE HAD A VERY LONG RAIN DELAY DURING THE GAME?
  • You failed to mention..
    that Nascar is boring!!!
    • Ratings
      Anthony, actually RATING refers to the percentage of the market watching. SHARE is the percentage of all televisions that are turned on.
    • Boring
      I would rather watch Paint Dry than a Napcar race!!!!!
    • I did not fail to notice that the stands were not near full this week as well even though Talladega pulled out 35,000 plus seats.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT