NASCAR boldly predicting better racing, more passing at Brickyard 400

June 5, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

NASCAR officials are in Indianapolis this week doing a media sweep and making some bold claims about this year’s Brickyard 400.

NASCAR predicts its Gen-6 race car, which debuted this year, will dramatically increase fan interest and attendance at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway's Brickyard 400.

That would be welcome news for Speedway executives, who watched attendance slump from 138,000 in 2011 to 125,000 in 2012. It's been quite a free fall since 2005 when, according to NASCAR, 280,000 watched the race.

There have long been grumblings about IMS, with its relative lack of banking, not being an exciting venue for stock cars. But the racing, many fans have said, became noticeably less appealing with the 2007 introduction of NASCAR's fifth-generation car, the Car of Tomorrow.

NASCAR parked the Car of Tomorrow after last year in favor of the Gen-6, which has been two years in the making and whose outlines hew closer to actual showroom cars.

NASCAR fans in Indy might still be skeptical given the lack of passing they’ve seen at the Brickyard 400 in recent years.

Those days are over, said Trent Bailey, NASCAR’s competition communication manager.

“I think we’ve proven, and our drivers have confirmed, that this new car is racier,” Bailey said.

For an indication of what the action on the IMS track will look like on July 28, NASCAR officials recommend that fans tune in to this weekend's race in Pocono.

“The [Gen-6] car has more grip and that means more passing, even on flatter tracks like Indianapolis and Pocono,” Bailey told IBJ Tuesday.

There are several key aesthetic and technical reasons why this new car will have fans juiced about the Brickyard 400, Bailey said.

First is its look. NASCAR fans wanted some of the stock aspects returned to stock car racing, Bailey said.

“If you put it side by side with the car sold on the showroom floor, the silhouette is near identical,” he said. “People want to see the drivers race cars that look like the ones they buy.

“We listened to our fans and our manufacturers,” Bailey added. “They want the cars to be differentiated and to be able to recognize the different brands in the series.”

But NASCAR isn’t just a beauty contest. There are key reasons why this new car will perform better on the track—even at IMS.

The Gen-6 car is 150 pounds lighter than the Car of Tomorrow due to adding a carbon fiber hood and deck lid—NASCAR-speak for trunk.

“That gives it a better power-to-weight ratio,” Bailey said.

In addition, the car is 60 pounds heavier on the left side, which helps it turn better on ovals like IMS where a driver turns only left. That’s 10 pounds heavier on the left than the Car of Tomorrow. While the change might seem small, Bailey insists that, together with other design changes, the Gen-6 will have a big impact on the quality of racing at the Brickyard 400.

NASCAR also added a steeper angle, or camber, to the rear axle, which helps the Gen-6 handle better. And Bailey pointed out that Goodyear has done extensive tire testing with the new car at various tracks, including Indianapolis.

Indianapolis race fans haven't forgotten the 2008 Brickyard 400, when cars had to pit every 10 to 12 laps because tires were shredding.

The aero package of the new car also has some important differences. The biggest is a larger rear spoiler. That increases down-force, which helps the car stick to the track better and theoretically should help the cars run faster at Indianapolis.

Roof-mounted cameras were even removed because they gave cars in the lead 80 pounds of extra down-force, giving them an advantage on curves.

So what does all this mean?

“Ideally, closer, faster racing and more passing,” Bailey said. “Already this year, we’ve gotten lots of positive feedback on the new car from the drivers. In the simplest terms, they say it feels ‘real racey.’”

Earlier this year, NASCAR did an East Coast media swing, getting the word out about the new car. NASCAR is trying to do everything it can to reverse attendance and television ratings declines that have gripped the series in recent years.

NASCAR knows Indianapolis is an important market. In addition to hosting one of its biggest races all year, Indy is usually No. 2 in TV ratings for NASCAR races. Charlotte, N.C., is No. 1. Series reps are spending two days here talking to media outlets.

Just how the changes will affect attendance this year is difficult to say. NASCAR officials certainly are burning rubber trying to increase interest.

“Ever since the season opener in Daytona this year, we’ve had an uptick in interest everywhere we’ve been,” said Matt Ciesluk, NASCAR's integrated marketing communications director. “We expect the same in Indianapolis.”

  • NA$CAR Gimmicks
    Better for NA$CAR to promote the fake Danica-Stenhouse script than try to sell the notion that somehow the Sickyard 400 is going to be a good race. It never has been. And it never will be. People have moved off of NA$CAR. It is over France. You are NEVER going to be the next best thing to the NFL and all that contrived BS. People are returning to "NA$CAR is a hillbilly sport" mentality only now it is worse. At least, originally, it was real racing.
  • How to fix them
    Here's what needs to be done to save the Indy 500 and Brickyard. They need to get fan friendly. And high tech. 1) Completely replace all bleacher seats with seats with backs. And, replace all the existing seats with comfortable seats wide enough and lengthly enough to accomodate wider bodies and small coolers. areas in the stands need to be constructed at logistical locations so fans can store their coolers without walking hundreds of steps to get a drink or food. this will require building more stands. There's plenty of room. 2) Provide "state fair" like "train like" shuttles to continuously circle inside the infield and outside the track to give people lifts. No 50+ fan wants to park in the Coke lot and walk to the second turn. and there needs to be hundreds of these trains so nobody is waiting. 3) Large screen TV screens need to be everywhere. so fans can see every aspect corner and straght away regardless of where they sit or stand. 4) Wireless service needs to be provided and race streaming to allow mobile smart phones and tablets to view the race if you purchase a ticket. 5) If it's a sell out, then open it up for local TV broadcasts. Thereby building more fan support. The track needs to step up and make this thing fan-friendly again. The existing method of people getting to the track, getting to their seats, and enduring the race, is just too old-fashioned. It's 1950ish. It's time for a new generation of really progressive thinking for the track. Do all the above, and the drivers and cars will do fine.
  • Good ideas
    Larry has good ideas. I would also submit that reducing capacity to about 150,000 seats is long overdue. I would also submit replacing the F1 garages with seats similar to what existed there years ago so sightlines for folks sitting on the front stretch are nor reduced as they are now.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.