Shapiro's site in Carmel draws two bids

September 19, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two would-be buyers submitted wildly divergent offers for the former Shapiro’s Delicatessen in Carmel City Center, but any decision is at least a month away.

The Carmel Redevelopment Commission on Wednesday opened a pair of sealed bids for the 11,500-square-foot brick building, taking them under advisement until staff and outside counsel has a chance to review the proposals.

Under consideration: a $2.1 million offer from Indianapolis-based LOR Corp. and a $500,000 bid from locally based Eclipse Real Estate.

The minimum asking price was $2.1 million.

Bidders also were asked to disclose how they intend to use the property, but their responses were not read aloud with the offers.

The building is zoned for office, retail and commercial use.

LOR, which owns and manages almost three dozen commercial properties, sold the United Package Liquors chain to Big Red Liquors in March. Commission staffer Matt Worthley noted that its bid is contingent on terms spelled out in an accompanying document, but did not elaborate.

Company president Adam L. Hill, who attended the meeting, declined to provide details until the proposal is made public following a decision.

Staff will make a recommendation at the commission’s next meeting Oct. 16.

Shapiro’s built the eatery at 918 S. Range Line Road in 2001, kicking off the Carmel City Center redevelopment project. But nearby projects were slow to materialize, and the deli struggled financially.

The CRC bought Shapiro’s $2.5 million mortgage three years ago to help ease the strain; the restaurant closed in June.

Any thoughts on what should take its place?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Excuses
    "Shapiro’s built the eatery at 918 S. Range Line Road in 2001, kicking off the Carmel City Center redevelopment project. But nearby projects were slow to materialize, and the deli struggled financially" What nearby projects failed to materialize? Other restaurants nearby are doing quite well.
  • Shapiro's Mistake
    Brian Shapiro made a huge mistake in leaving the 86th St. corridor. At that time, he claimed his Jewish customers were moving to Carmel. Some did but not enough to support his deli.
    • How?
      How do you submit a bid so far under the minimum? And WELL under in fact.
    • Agree with Brian
      If they were still at 86th Street they would be open. There are still spots down there if they want come back but a bit smaller. MCL does well. To bad I never made it to the fancy Carmel store. Now its gone....
      • Agree with Clayton (revised)
        If they were still at 86th Street they would be open. There are still spots down there if they want come back but a bit smaller. MCL does well. To bad I never made it to the fancy Carmel store. Now its gone....

      Post a comment to this blog

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

      2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

      3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

      4. Send them back NOW.

      5. deport now

      ADVERTISEMENT