Indians' financial outlook sky high as attendance soars

October 2, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis Indians finished their 2013 season with the highest overall regular-season attendance of all 176 Minor League Baseball teams.

This year, the Indians drew 637,579 fans (8,980 per game) through the turnstiles. The Tribe’s home attendance was the fourth-largest in Victory Field history and the best single-season total since the team’s championship campaign in 2000.

The Indians’ record home attendance was 658,250 in 1999. Victory Field opened July 11, 1996.

Victory Field saw a record-setting eight sellouts this season, which surpassed the previous high mark of six capacity crowds in 1997. The Indians this season hosted 25 crowds of 10,000 or more spectators.

As the season progressed, the Indians drew consistently larger crowds, drawing more than10,000 fans per game since the beginning of May (55 games), 10,500 plus since the start of June (43 games) and 11,000 plus in each of the last 24 home contests dating back to July 4.

The Indians weren’t done blazing a trail as the regular season concluded. Along with leading all of the Minors in regular-season attendance, the Indians also boasted Victory Field’s largest playoff crowd of 11,327 fans on Sept. 6 against Durham. The single-game record-setting crowd was larger than all other International League team’s combined home attendance for the postseason, with the Tribe outdrawing Pawtucket through the Red Sox’s three combined games (9,518), Rochester through two combined games (8,587) and Durham through two combined games (7,357).

This season’s regular season attendance was a 7 percent increase over last season, when the Indians drew 595,043 for 70 regular-season home games, averaging 8,501 fans per game. Two post-season home games pushed last year's total attendance up to 605,575 , which was fifth among all Minor League Baseball teams.

Attendance has been on a steady rise the past five seasons, hitting 549,552 in 2009; 569,969 in 2010; and 580,082 in 2011.

Though year-end financial data for the publicly traded team is not yet available, ticket sales revenue this year should be near $5 million, and overall team profit should be near or above $1.7 million. That's a considerable increase in profits from just a few years ago. In 2010 the team had a profit of $944,286.

The Indians, a farm club of the Pittsburgh Pirates, saw profit grow to $1.57 million on operating revenue of $11 million in 2012, compared with profit of $1.06 million on revenue of $10 million in 2011.

Ticket sales increased from $4.3 million in 2011 to more than $4.6 million in 2012. Ticket sales are a key indicator of the franchise’s overall financial health, since they directly affect parking, concession, souvenir and other ancillary revenue streams.

The Indians consistently find themselves in the black while paying the city $500,000 annually to lease Victory Field, paying for all operational and capital expenses at the ball park and receiving no public subsidy.



 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Bravo
    Now THATS how you run a ball club. Perhaps they'll offer Mr. Simon an internship?
  • Congrats
    Congratulations to a first class organization. Love going to games at Victory Field. Good to read positive stories about great venues and organizations in our city.
  • Park Status
    Just curious does the state supply any money to Victory Field and the Indians. Victory Field is in a state park.
  • Check It Out
    Victory Field is a really fine park. And the Tribe is fun to watch. If you haven't been, you are missing out on one of Indianapolis' best attractions.
    • Actually, Nick....
      Victory Field is NOT located in WRSP. Rather, it is located just across the street.
    • WRSP
      Victory Field is a part of White River State Park. They do not receive state money that I'm aware of, rather pay the CIB for their lease of the land...as stated in the article above.
    • Ballpark is Great Value for Taxpayers
      Victory Field is not only a great ballpark, it is one of the greatest investments of tax dollars ever in Indy. The facility cost only $18 million to build, and the Indians paid for half of that. Dollar for dollar, only the Monon Trail is a better investment for Indy taxpayers!
    • Curious
      I'm a season ticket holder for the BATS @ Slugger Field in Louisville. Other than your team what amenities does Victory Field offer that makes it so well liked?
    • First Rate for Families
      I appreciate being able to take a group of boys to the ballpark and not going broke. The dollar night food menu is great! Good, clean fun for all.

    Post a comment to this blog

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT