You-review-it Monday: Matisse, Macheath and more

October 13, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For me, the weekend included trips to the Matisse show at the Indianapolis Museum of Art (more on that in my upcoming column), a trek to Bloomington for the John Mellencamp/Stephen King musical "Ghost Brothers of Darkland Country" (reviewed here), and being a witness to Indianapolis Opera's unfortunate production of "Threepenny Opera" (more on that later).

I also finished a pair of theatrical biographies ("Will in the World" and "Eugene O'Neill: Beyond Mourning and Tragedy") and found time to watch the disarming "Mud," a low-key, effective film with a rich sense of character and place and solid performances all around.

What about you?

Did you go to the movies for "Gravity"? Visit either the Headless Horeseman at Conner Prairie or the unscripted improv version at Comedy Sportz? Did you go Oranje at the fairgrounds or catch one of the final performances of the IRT's outstanding "Crucible"?

What did you do on the A&E front this weekend? 


  • The WONDERFUL Threepenny Opera
    I attended The Threepenny Opera on Saturday night and loved it. It was lively and entertaining. I found Caitlin Mathes performance to be especially exceptional.
  • Chocolate Fest
    I attended Arts for Learning's Chocolate Fest on Saturday afternoon at the Harrison Center for the Arts with my 6 year old daughter and had a blast! Chocolate tastings, art activities, food trucks, and an awesome up-close experience with Melissa Gallant's harp made the afternoon quite unique and special.
  • Threepenny Opera
    I saw Threepenny and thought it was great. Being written in the 20th century, in English, and with lots of dialogue, I thought it was an easily accessible and enjoyable show. I was also impressed with the set design and their use of the space at the Indianapolis Opera Center. Overall I thought it was a good production and I would recommend it to others.
    • A Caitlin Fan
      A librettist, I attended Portland, Oregon Opera Classes in which Caitlin sang our work and chatted with us. A few days later she did fifteen Kurt Weill songs, cabaret style, at Portland's Vie de Boheme. She is warm, personable, and incredibly talented. Please tell me more about her Threepenny performance. Ralph
    • did you leave out a word?
      We plan to see Three penny Opera this week. Did you leave out a word between "unfortuntely" and "production"?
      • not at 3 Penny
        Perhaps you were in the parking lot when the 3 Penny was performed...or did your ears miss the wonderful singers? Grand Opera is not always grand...too expensive to perform with regularity these days. Good show and perfect for the fall season of ghouls, ghosts and goblins. Jenny was thrilling.
      • correction
        Peggy, It's been corrected. Thank you. Barbara, Nope. I was there for all three hours Friday night. I'm glad you enjoyed it.
      • Threepenney Opera
        I thought it was an extremely well performed period piece that not only told a story of seedy Berlin but is an historical commentary of the times and a rebellion to grand opera. The voices were great and the intimacy of the small venue allowed it to work.
      • Chekhov
        Saw "Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike" at the Phoenix, and as usual for the Phoenix, it was an excellent production -- but what an awful play, even by Durang standards! Anyone expecting a clever satire on Chekhov will be subjected to references to Chekhov bluntly inserted into the play, and everyone will be subjected to a rambling Luddite rant inserted near the end of the show.
      • Agree on Threepenny Opera
        I'm with Lou on the Threepenny Opera. The musical performances were great but they couldn't save the production. Not one joke landed during the entire first act of the Friday night performance.

      Post a comment to this blog

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

      2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

      3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

      4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

      5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.