Clock ticking on Natatorium decision, Olympic trial hangs in balance

November 6, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Even with millions of dollars in needed repairs and an uncertain future, the IUPUI Natatorium continues to be a player in the national swimming and diving scene.

USA Diving has announced that Indianapolis and Atlanta are the finalists vying for the 2016 Olympic Diving Trials, which will be held in June2016.

“We believe Atlanta and Indianapolis presented an overall package that will best meet the needs of our athletes and our vision for our 2016 Trials,” USA Diving CEO Linda Paul said.

But if Indianapolis is going to beat out Atlanta, USA Diving will have to be convinced that Indiana University—which owns and controls the IUPUI Natatorium—is serious about making the $17 million to $20 million in upgrades needed at the facility on the west side of downtown.

Tom Morrison, IU’s vice president for capital planning and facilities, said he’d like to have a plan in place by the end of this year. He may not have quite that long if Indianapolis is going to nab this event. USA Diving is set to announce the host of the 2016 Olympic Trials on Dec. 10.

Sources familiar with the situation said Morrison is preparing to roll out a plan, and that officials of the National Institute for Fitness and Sport, which already operates a fitness facility near IUPUI, is poised to take over daily operations of the Natatorium.

NIFS officials, however, have made it clear they won’t be financially responsible for the upgrades to the facility. Though a plan appears to either be in place or very nearly so, no one is officially letting on.

Indiana Sports Corp. CEO Allison Melangton is confident uncertainty surrounding the venue won’t hamper Indy’s efforts to land the 2016 Olympic Diving Trials.

“I think we will be comfortable in the plan and in the process by [Dec. 10],” Melangton told IBJ on Tuesday.

Melangton added that officials for USA Diving and ISC are “keenly aware” of the repairs and upgrades needed at the 4,700-seat Natatorium and the progress on the situation with IU is “being communicated to [USA Diving].”

Melangton told IBJ that while the ISC is not in a position to contribute money toward the Natatorium upgrades, she said she would consider approaching her organization’s corporate partners for help.

While the Natatorium’s pools and diving well are in good shape, the roof needs to be replaced, as do the heating and air-conditioning and electrical systems, Morrison said. Officials for USA Swimming said the facility needs modern video and scoreboards and other amenities common in newer facilities.

IUPUI’s Natatorium has been the site of so many big events that it’s almost easy to take them for granted. But competition just to become a finalist for an event such as the 2016 U.S. Diving Olympic Trials is intense.

In all, 19 cities bid for the event. The list was cut to six this summer. Last month, USA Diving announced four semifinalists were eliminated from the bidding process.

Tucson, Ariz.; Riverside, Calif.; Greensboro, N.C.; and Minneapolis didn’t make the final cut. All four of those cities—especially Greensboro—pulled out all the stops to get the event. And with good reason.

The nine-day Olympic Diving Trials will have a healthy multi-million-dollar economic impact on the host city and draw millions of eyeballs from a national telecast.

Six days of the meet, which will decide who competes at the 2016 Rio Olympics, will be broadcast on NBC.

The fact that USA Diving has chosen Indianapolis as a finalist despite not knowing who will be running the venue at the time of the competition and without a commitment that upgrades will be made speaks to the overall strength of Indianapolis’ bid and the history of the still-vaunted Natatorium.

In October, Indiana Swimming Event Director Arlene McDonald told IBJ: “We’re in a holding pattern in terms of going after and hosting the very highest-level events.”

The Natatorium, it appears, could be pulling out of its holding pattern. The fact that USA Diving is willing to make Indianapolis one of two finalists for its crown jewel event clearly is an encouraging sign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT