Pacers score NBA's highest TV ratings jump

December 11, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

UPDATE: Tuesday’s Indiana Pacers-Miami Heat game was the highest rated regular season Pacers telecast ever on Fox Sports Indiana, according to Nielsen. The Pacers’ 90-84 win in front of a sellout crowd at Bankers Life Fieldhouse earned a 9.33 household rating in Indianapolis. That surpasses the previous high of 9.32 set Feb. 4, 2003 vs. the Los Angeles Lakers.

As the Indiana Pacers bolted to a franchise-best record, television ratings for the team's games on Fox Sports Indiana during the first month of the season have skyrocketed.

The Pacers rating gains come at a time when TV audiences are increasingly fractionalized by continually growing cable TV and online offerings. In this day and age, any double-digit percentage rating increase is reason to celebrate. That's why Fox Sports officials have as much reason to smile as Pacers officials and fans.

The TV ratings for Pacers games on Fox were up 113 percent in November over the same period a year ago, according to New York-based Nielsen Media Research. That is the team’s highest opening month since 2005 and the increase is the largest in the NBA this season.

Overall, the Pacers’ local television ratings ranked fourth in the NBA, up from 13th at the end of last season, according to Nielsen. The Pacers Nov. 27 game at Charlotte (6.45) was the highest-rated regular season game on Fox Sports Indiana since April 20, 2005 (6.52, season finale, vs. Chicago), according to Nielsen.

Nearly 70,000 central Indiana households tuned into the Pacers' Nov. 27 game. The Pacers telecasts on Fox Sports Indiana in November averaged a 4. 1 household rating in the Indianapolis market. That means an average of almost 45,000 households are watching each game.

After Tuesday night's victory over Miami, the 19-3 Pacers are almost certain to gain a larger following. TV ratings for NBA teams often increase as playoff intrigue ratchets up later in the season.

Since the Pacers figure to be hot in the hunt for the No. 1 spot for the Eastern Conference, their ratings are likely to increase during the second half of the season more than most of the other 29 NBA teams.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Pacers
    So true....here's my preference in watching local bb: Pacers, high school, IU, Butler, Perdue. All very boring except the Pacers. 'Bout time.
    • Thank you for following up on ratings
      Thank you for following up on Pacers ratings; I had previously questioned whether the early Orlando ratings were truly due to increased interest in the Pacers or the IU tie-in. Very clearly, the Pacers' success on the court has translated to great ratings!
    • Attendance?
      I also applaud the Pacers efforts to increase home attendance by cutting the fees added to ticket prices. However, just the basic tic price is still incredibly high. An average Joe wanting to take his son to see an NBA game one night downtown has to plunk down at least $200 just for average seats...no parking, no popcorn, just the seats. WOW. Makes the cable prices look good.
      • Pacer Cost
        Kids under 10 eat free or maybe 2 for 1 on concessions? Buy 5 tickets get free soda/popcorn.
      • Re: Russ
        Where on earth do you get the $200 number? Tickets for a regular game are like $10-$15 apiece tops. Yes, youre in the nose bleeds, but it's still a great view. It's an incredibly good value. You can't see a movie for cheaper than that.
      • Spell check?
        Purdue is spelled with a u, not an e.

      Post a comment to this blog

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

      2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

      3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

      4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

      5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

      ADVERTISEMENT