Chase attaches name to downtown’s tallest building

December 18, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Chase TowerChase has joined the ranks of most other large banks that have affixed their names atop the downtown towers housing their Indiana operations.

At 48 stories, Chase Tower is downtown’s tallest building, making it hard to miss the bank’s moniker and logo that now adorn it.

So what took Chase so long to put signage on the tower? Apparently it didn’t have the rights under previous lease arrangements, according to local real estate sources.

Suburban-Boston-based CommonWealth REIT—which already owns downtown’s 630,000-square-foot PNC Center—paid $201 million last year for the tower. The seller was Beacon Capital Partners, also of Boston. Beacon bought the building in 2011 as part of a package of 14 properties it acquired for $1.7 billion from Charter Hall Office REIT of Australia.

The building opened in 1990. At 830 feet, it’s the 38th-tallest tower in the United States.

The tower was originally conceived in the late 1970s by the late Frank E. McKinney Jr., chairman of American Fletcher Corp., the holding company for American Fletcher National Bank and Trust Co., according to the building’s written history. At the time, American Fletcher was Indiana’s largest financial institution.

Before construction began, American Fletcher was bought in 1986 by Bank One Corp. McKinney became chairman of Bank One’s Indiana operations, and planning for the tower gained steam. Construction began in 1988.

An interesting tidbit about the building: It secured the prestigious 111 Monument Circle address, even though the building fronts Ohio Street, by integrating with American Fletcher’s existing headquarters on Monument Circle.
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Night Lighting
    Now if Chase will just keep their signage lit past 10pm!!
  • North
    Or put a sign on the North Side so it can easily be seen on the 65 North split. It is visible, I was able to see that something new was added from all the way at 465 on Southside by Meridian street.
  • north
    the north side sign should be lit soon
    • Disappointing
      It is disappointing to see our states most iconic high-rise resort to having their name attached to the building they partially occupy. Is Chase that insecure that they think people don't know they're there. Their name is already plastered on the AFNB building on the Circle and the Meridian and Pennsylvania Street "wings". For that matter, all the other banks beat them to it years ago… BankOne resisted this temptation, Chase couldn't.
      • To Cheap to leave the ligths on
        At 9:48pm the lights were already off. How cheap can they be?
      • insecure???
        Franco, c'mon. Insecure? That's silly. Having your name affixed at the top of the tallest tower in Indy is pure brash advertising. Esp if it is a bank, it portrays strength and prestige. I'm surprised it took so long, but Chase probably tried to re-negotiate signage in the lease, but couldn't get a reasonable deal until now. I like it. Have no idea why they would turn off the lights by 10:00 pm however. Seems silly to me.
      • Signs
        Really wish the people who put the sign would have it stay on longer than 10pm

      Post a comment to this blog

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT
      1. I still don't understand how the FBI had any right whatsoever to investigate this elderly collector. Before the Antiquities Act it was completely legal to buy, trade or collect Native American artifacts. I used to see arrow heads, axes, bowls, corn grinders at antique shops and flea markets for sale and I bought them myself. But that was in the late 60's and early 70's. And I now know that people used to steal items from sites and sell them. I understand that is illegal. But we used to find arrow heads and even a corn grinder in our back yard when I was a child. And I still have those items today in my small collection.

      2. I lived in California and they had many of the things noted in the proposed suggestions from the "Blue Ribbon Panel". California is near financial collapse now. Let's not turn the great state of Indiana into a third world dump like California.

      3. The temporary closure of BR Avenue will get a lot of attention. But, one thing reported by the IndyStar really stands out to me, and is extraordinarily depressing: “Police also have agreed to crack down on noise violations, traffic violations and public intoxication.” In other words, the police have generously agreed to do their jobs (temporarily, at least), instead of just standing around waiting for someone to call 911. When is someone in this department going to get off their fat arse (looking at you, Chief), get their minds out of 1975-era policing and into 2014, and have his department engage in pro-active work instead of sitting around waiting for someone to be shot? Why in the hell does it take 7 people getting shot in one night in one of the city’s biggest tourist destinations, to convince the police (reluctantly, it would appear) that they actually need to do their f’n jobs? When is the Chief going to realize that there’s a huge, direct, proven correlation between enforcing the law (yes, all laws, especially those affecting quality of life) and preventing larger crimes from occurring? Is it racial BS? Is that what this extraordinary reluctance is all about? Is the department and the city terrified that if they do their jobs, they might offend someone? Whom, exactly? Will the victims of violence, murder, assault, rape, robbery, and theft be offended? Will the citizens who have to tolerate their deteriorating quality of life be offended? Will the businesses who see their customers flee be offended? Or, is it simple ignorance (maybe the Chief hasn’t heard about NYC’s success in fighting crime - it’s only the biggest g*&#am city in the country, after all)? Either way, Chief, if you don’t want to do your job, then step down. Let someone who actually wants the job take it.

      4. I thought Indiana had all the funding it needed for everything. That's why the state lottery and casino gambling were allowed, as the new tax revenue would take care of everything the state wanted to do.The recommendations sound like they came from California. Better think about that. What is the financial condition of that state?

      5. I was a fan of WIBC in the morning, Steve was the only WIBC host that I listened too, he gave the news with so much flare that I enjoyed listening to him on my way to work. Katz is no Steve. Sadly, I will not be listening to WIBC anymore.

      ADVERTISEMENT