Carmel council delays annual arts funding

April 22, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Carmel City Council postponed approval of the city’s annual arts grant program Monday amid questions about “perceived gaps” in the municipal budget.

“The funding discussion deserves to be done in public,” Councilor Rick Sharp said, referring to a flurry of emails he and other members received over the weekend assuring them that the money is available.

Financial consultant Curt Coonrod assured the council that the city’s spending plan has not changed since it passed in October, but acknowledged officials still need to take a procedural step to finalize the budget.

More than a dozen local arts organizations are slated to receive funding from the 10-year-old city program in 2014. The city sets aside 1 percent of its general fund budget for the grants each year.

“The problem is, we don’t know what the general fund is,” said council Finance Committee Chairwoman Luci Snyder.

Coonrod and the clerk-treasurer’s office gave the council different numbers, she said—and neither is high enough to support the $681,400 in grants Mayor Jim Brainard has proposed. Brainard was traveling Monday, so he couldn’t offer an explanation.

Still, Snyder said she’s confident the issue can be resolved quickly.

“Last year or the year before, we made a mess of this thing and it dragged on far too long,” she said. “But it’s really important that we sit down and make sure we’re all on the same page.”

The council delayed $700,000 in arts grants for months last year. Snyder later proposed a change in the way the grants are administered, but dropped the initiative when it became clear it lacked support.

Brainard accepts applications from the city’s Support for the Arts Fund each year and submits his grant recommendations to the council for approval. Since 2004, more than $6.8 million has been awarded.

“These organizations are worthy of public support, which we view as an economic development tool for the city,” he said in a prepared statement.

Here’s a look at the organizations set to receive funding this year:

— Carmel Symphony Orchestra, $205,000

— Booth Tarkington Civic Theatre, $200,000

— Actors Theatre of Indiana, $110,000

— Gregory Hancock Dance Theatre, $45,000

— Indiana Ballet Conservatory, $20,000

— Carmel Community Players, $15,000

— International Talent Academy, $15,000

— Carmel Arts Council, $14,900

— Museum of Miniature Houses, $13,500

— Central Indiana Dance Ensemble, $12,000

— Indiana Wind Symphony, $12,000

— Indianapolis Symphonic Choir, $12,000

— Indianapolis Children's Choir, $4,000

— Young Voices Inspire, $3,000
 

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Interesting
    The top four recipients of public money were to received $560,000 total and all four are based in the Center for the Performing Arts. It would be interesting to see what their rent and other costs for residence at the Center cost, because I suspect a large portion of those funds go straight back into the Center. It's smoke and mirrors. These organizations could not survive in their digs without heavy public support.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT