Blu-ray not singing the blues

March 6, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
So Blu-ray won the high-definition format battle, effectively turning HD DVD into this generation’s Betamax.

Personally, this didn’t affect me at all. I managed to stay out of this turf war largely because a clearer picture and movie theater-quality sound are not things I’ve been willing to invest in. (I might think differently if I had a large-screen TV, of course). As long as DVD’s continue to play and my VHS machine still works, I’m good.

Am I alone here? Or am I missing something?

"If all we do is put high-def movies on discs, we're going to have a niche laserdisc business," Universal Home video head Craig Kornblau told Variety. "It's about creating a unique experience compared to the one we have with the DVD player."

Is there a “unique experience” to be had?

Or is Blu-ray just an expensive, slightly improved way to pump up the entertainment economy?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I am a bit of a home theatre nut, but a lot of the movies I've seen in high-def formats really do blow open the doors of perception for films that make maximum use of the capabilities of the medium. I was given a free HD DVD player (whoops) when I purchased a 42 plasma TV last year - hey, my old TV died; what was I gonna do? I have seen both BLADE RUNNER and 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY on HD DVD and they both represent immediately and starkly obvious improvements on their previously available standard-def DVD counterparts. (I'm sure there's nearly a 1:1 transference of picture quality between that and Blu-Ray.) 2001, in particular, looked like a whole new film; its vividness and clarity are astonishing, and the film likely looks as good or better than the fresh 70mm prints shown at the movies in 1968.

    As far as the experience, HD DVD and Blu-Ray are capable of everything DVDs can do; their interatcivity is just bumped up a notch, since you can call up menus and on-screen scene selection without interrupting the movie. HD DVD also featured picture-in-picture commentary, which I'm sure Blu-Ray will be providing soon, now that they're the last format standing.

    So, in a nutshell . . . yes. High def does offer advantages if you're interested in exploiting the full capacity of a visual medium - worthless if you don't have an HDTV, though, obviously. There's the rub.

    Meanwhile, I'm trying to figure out if I should take advantage of the fire sale prices on HD DVDs or just cut my losses and buy a PlayStation 3.
  • I guess I don't have any thoughts...at all. I still play my 78's, watche tv on a 28 year old set, and wonder what the rest of you are talking about. I do realize that we have to do something later this year when they change over to whatever it is they are going to change over to. I just hope I can get some good advise on what to buy. (I remember the first tv my parents bought - a 8 round tube Ratheon, looked like a suit case). We watched Blade Runner recently and really enjoyed it. I'm looking forward to watching it again on this new format, whatever it is.
  • I just don't think your average video watcher or game player doesn't know much difference between the two. As video game fan and an IT person myself, I have been celebrating the Blu-Ray concept since Sony put it on the PS3.

    If you look at it, Blu-Ray is just starting on expanding space on their disk. Holding 25-50 GB per disk is nothing to laugh at (compared to HD-DVD's 15-30 GB). Ovbiously companies have seen the benefit of more space and the potentional success of this. Better Audio, Video. More content.

    Whats next? Complete Star Wars series and Special Commentaries on 1 to 3 Blu-Ray DVDs in 2012 (35 year Anniversry of the first one) with Hi-Def Remastered?

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT