Bob Knight, still The General

July 14, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
nellyWhether he ever gets another job as a basketball coach remains to be seen, but Bob Knight is still The General.

During an exhibition softball game played in St. Louis in conjunction with the Major League Baseball All-Star game, the former Indiana University and Texas Tech basketball coach, took matters into his own hand. The game aired last night on ESPN.

Knight, who displayed a solid fielder’s glove at first base, delivered a motivational speech to his team, which was trailing late in the game. Spurred by The General’s battle cry, Knight’s team rallied for a 10-8 victory.

Knight, true to his form, even argued with an umpire. But this time, it seemed to be a little more like good-natured ribbing.

“You can't expect officials to be correct all the time,” Knight said. “But this time, he did a great job making the right call.”

Even more amazing was the friendship that kindled between Knight and rap star and actor Nelly, a St. Louis native who clubbed a two-run homer and made a diving catch in center field. The two teammates laughed together and generally buddied around during and after the game. They even shared co-MVP honors.

“He made that first play, and I said, ‘That guy knows what he’s doing out there,’” Knight said of Nelly.

Nelly returned the compliment as the two were being interviewed by ESPN’s Erin Andrews, quipping, “Coach Bob Knight, he can handle himself over there at first base.”

To follow The Score on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ibjthescore.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Wow, the softer side of Bob Knight. Nice.
  • I'd pay to see The General in a rap video. Now that would sell. Seriously, though, it looks like Knight finally surrounded himself with good PR folks. Or he's simply learned things over time, often the hard way.
  • Knight has always had that softer side about him. Too often people only want to see the The General side of his demeanor.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT