Bollywood in Indianapolis

January 13, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
While "Slumdog Millionaire" isn't a Bollywood film, the Golden Globe winner does play with some of the conventions popularized by the Indian film industry--including the joyful dance sequence that ends the film. 

"Slumdog's" box office and critical success may bode well for a long-running series of Indian film screenings at Georgetown 14 Cinemas. The lastest offering--the kung fu/romance/comedy/musical "Chandni Chowk to China"--opens this week.

At a preview, I found the film both charmingly over-the-top and frustratingly familiar. It's lowly-vegitable-chopper-turned-hero plot has been done a thousand times. And our heroes shameless mugging wouldn't be out of place coming from the cast of a Sid and Marty Krofft kids show from the 1970s.

But Bollywood isn't know for its originality. Rather, the pleasures are in the details. And you aren't likely to see an American film with as many audacious leaps as this one. A father figure whose seat-of-the-pants kicks sends the hero flying high, a magical umbrella that our heroine uses at just the right time, and a battle that leads to an army of knocked out villains raining down wouldn't pass muster at the first writers meeting if the movie came from Hollywood. Add in a hilarious airplane lugging bin sight gag, a suprising splattered bug, and dance sequences that can pop up out of nowhere, and you have something unique--at least to American eyes.

Do these elements justify the overly familiar plot played out over a numbing 168 minutes? For me, no. But now that I've seen the pleasures Bollywood can hold, I'm going to keep my eyes open for more. And now, thanks to Manoranjan Inc. and its arrangement with Georgetown 14, I know where to look. For more details, click here.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Love me some Georgetown 14 goodness.

    Thanks for the link, Lou. Bookmarked. You definitely won't find the Bollywood offerings on FANDANGO

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT