Boone incomes edging Hamilton

April 30, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Hamilton County is where the wealth is, followed by Boone County, right?

Not necessarily, anymore.

The average person in Boone County now makes more money than the average person next door in Hamilton County.

In an upcoming column in IBJ, Morton Marcus, who formerly directed the Indiana Business Research Center, points out that per-capita personal income grew faster in Boone County between 2000 and 2006 than in Hamilton County.

Thatâ??s partly because the pool of total income in Hamilton County was diluted by the births of more children, Marcus says.

Still, he adds that itâ??s news for Boone to eclipse Hamilton on a measure of wealth.

What do you think?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • dougApril 30, 2008 3:39 PM
    I think that people in Hamilton County make more money than people in Boone County.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • RichApril 30, 2008 9:33 PM
    The study or story should compare persons that are old enough and capable enough to work in both counties. Morton Marcus says Hamilton County is diluted by the number of babies. So in fact people who can work in Hamilton County do in fact make more money.

    P.S. Not that Zionsville is not an affluent and very nice community.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • DKMay 1, 2008 8:28 AM
    As a long-time resident of Fishers, I can attest to the huge numbers of children there. Schools are continuously being added. Perhaps it's because housing costs there are more affordable than in Carmel or Zionsville.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • KathyMay 1, 2008 8:49 AM
    Does it really matter?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • MarkMay 1, 2008 10:06 AM
    After reading Morton for a long time, Morton likes to write these articles to stir the pot. He manages the numbers. I'm one of those numbers people as well and you can masssage it to point out anything. Studying affluence based on per capita. Look at the population difference among Boone county and Hamilton. A LARGE difference. I would be like saying 50% of the presedential candidates are no longer on the ballots after Obama wins the Primary. that 50% really only means one person left! Morton likes to stir the pot and create controversy. Don't worry about the Per Capita.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • MervGriffinMay 1, 2008 10:34 AM
    Yes, Kathy it matters a lot. And for a lot of reasons, some of them business related, some of them not ... whether you like it or not, it matters a lot to a lot of people.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT