Another case has surfaced in which Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi personally weighed in on behalf of defense attorney Paul Page, Brizzi’s friend and business partner.
In late 2008, Brizzi ordered the dismissal of criminal trespassing and disorderly conduct charges in a case handled by deputy prosecutor Tom Walz. Deputy prosecutors working minor misdemeanor cases rarely have cause for interaction with Brizzi.
After receiving an e-mail from Brizzi saying he wanted the case dismissed, Walz approached his supervisor, Dirk Cushing, who contacted Chief Deputy Prosecutor David Wyser.
“It struck me as odd because at the time we had cooperation of the victim,” Cushing told IBJ. “I told [Wyser] we got this e-mail from Carl Brizzi directing us to dismiss the case. We had a discussion about the case, and we concluded with: ‘Boss says dismiss it, then you probably need to dismiss it.’”
Cushing could not find the original e-mail, but he remembered it saying “something to the effect that the victim had counsel and we needed to dismiss it.”
The case involved a woman who refused to leave her ex-boyfriend’s condo, allegedly vandalized a car she suspected of belonging to his new girlfriend, and threw a fit when police arrived, records show. IBJ is not reporting the names of the parties involved since the misdemeanor charges were dropped.
Brizzi said in e-mails to IBJ that the “alleged male victim retained a lawyer and didn't want to pursue prosecution.” Asked why he personally intervened in such a minor case, he said the victim had taken the unusual step of hiring an attorney, Thomas Farlow of Frost Brown Todd, who told Brizzi shortly before the victim's scheduled deposition that his client wanted the case dismissed.
Farlow said he called Page and said his client wanted to move on and not pursue the charges. Farlow later received a call from Brizzi asking him whether what he heard from Page was accurate.
Farlow said he didn't question Brizzi's involvement in the matter at the time, but agreed it was unusual for an elected prosecutor to be involved.
The case was unusual enough for Cushing to ask Walz to include a notation—“Per David Wyser”—next to his signature on the order of dismissal. He said it actually should have said “Per Carl Brizzi.”
It was only the second time Cushing has interacted with Brizzi on a case during his four-year tenure. His involvement seemed odd particularly because the case probably would have been dismissed even without Brizzi’s intervention.
The suspect’s lawyer was Page, who had arranged months earlier for Brizzi to own 50 percent of an Elkhart office building worth $900,000 without investing any cash or co-signing a loan.
Brizzi, a Republican in his second four-year term, has resisted calls from Marion County Republican Party Chairman Tom John and Mark Massa, the Republican candidate for prosecutor, to step down in the wake of a five-month-long IBJ investigation into Brizzi’s business dealings while in office.
IBJ on April 3 exclusively reported on Brizzi’s personal intervention in a major drug case to offer a reduced sentence to a Page client. Brizzi demanded a plea deal for accused drug dealer Joseph Mobareki that would be acceptable to Page over objections from both law-enforcement officers and his own deputy prosecutors. Brizzi also directed his staff to return $10,000 in seized cash.
Cushing, the deputy prosecutor in the trespassing case, said he has enjoyed working for Brizzi.
“Let’s just say I support him,” Cushing said. “One incident was a little unusual. Other than that I like working for Carl.”
Neither Page nor Walz returned phone messages.

















IBJ Conversations
28 Comments
Add Comment
one of the partners gave brizzi more than $1,500 in campaign contributions to have a case swept under the rug. and it worked! dig a little deeper ibj and that case will surface.
carl needs to resign. with each passing day, more of these cases are going to surface.
Whether a crank files a complaint against someone is actually not recorded, nor is it public record. It looks to me that you are engaging in falsehoods and in character assassination. What candidate are you working for? Massa or Bowes?
http://www.co.hamilton.in.us/apps/taxsale/taxsale3.asp
http://www.co.hamilton.in.us/app/reports/taxdetails.asp
Stealing from the elderly is not funny, but knowing that Durham has to spend the money on legal fees instead of some big party at Geist is.
Karma.
http://www.kccllc.net/documents/1050494/1050494100416000000000010.pdf
In and around early 2006, the former owner had one of his coaches in Oregon, transporting a country star celebrity. Out of the blue a local Oregon prosecutor shows up and demands the bus be shut down, stating he had received a call from a prosecutor in Indiana that this owner's company was committing crimes.
It should be noted this call from the Indianapolis prosecutor occured at the very time Carl Brizzi was making hundreds of thousands of dollars on the Cellstar tip Durham gave him. Isn't that peachy.
Oh, by the way, what about DNA Strand and the contract Brizzi awarded them....isn't DNA owned by Scott Newman?
Oh yeah, oh yeah....
Brizzi is obviously doing favors for others who have contributed to his campaign and his wallet. These cases SHOULD be uncovered and the truth told to the public (the people who elected Brizzi).
Schouten has done an excellent job uncovering all of the Brizzi stories as did IBJ in the Durham stories. Keep it up guys...don't let guys like Nate discourage your fine-tuned journalism skills.
Thank you IBJ for uncovering more Brizzi news.