Cabela's getting $18M in city bonds

June 11, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
The city of Greenwood plans to help with financing on a Cabela's store at the southeast corner of Interstate 65 and County Line Road. Cabela’sThe Nebraska-based outdoors retailing giant has a deal to buy 104 acres at the intersection, including 25 acres for the chain's second Indiana location and the rest for other development including at least two hotels, a water park and upscale restaurants, said Greenwood Mayor Charles Henderson. "It's a great company and a great store," he said. Henderson said Greenwood will issue $18 million in economic development bonds, with Cabela's guaranteeing repayment, to get the project off the ground. The development would be built across I-65 from Gander Mountain, between I-65 and Arlington Avenue (Graham Road). The city plans to widen Arlington to five lanes in anticipation of the project. Cabela's is slated to open in the fall of 2008. Its first Indiana store is scheduled to open in October of this year in Hammond.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Smart move by the Greenwood city leadership. A single Cabela's store is like getting the economic impact of a whole shopping mall at a far lower investment - $18mm in this case. These stores bring people in from far and wide to shop. Lots of out-of-towners (and North Siders like me!) will pay visits to Greenwood now. These stores also spur lots of other development - the hotels already mentioned are a great start. I've seen it over the years around the store they built in Owatonna, MN.

    Nice win for Greenwood. And smart, smart, smart to give the incentives to get this going. It will pay off many times over.
  • If only Indianapolis would get smart and widen South Emerson Ave, not only to attract new businesses like Greenwood, but alleviate the mess Emerson Ave South of Southport Road has become. A 2 lane Emerson Ave is a traffic nightmare. Smart move on Greenwood's part to put in the correct infrastructure beforehand. Thumbs up to Johnson County and Thumbs down to Marion County.
  • Wasn't there a huge dispute in northwest Indiana over the wisdom of providing Cabela's economic incentives for such low paying retail jobs?

    If I recall properly, Gander Mountain was actively lobbying government not to pick winners and losers in retail shopping by giving its competitor taxpayer incentives.
  • As I recall, the dispute up in NW Indiana was about State money. And I think Cabela's was asking for more than what the state usually offers based on numbers of jobs created, etc.

    On the whole, I would also prefer that government not pick winners and losers in the economy. But on the other hand, it can be good for government to support a specific piece of development because of the other development it can create.
  • Am I the only person on the planet who does not know what Cabela's is? So does this mean that the Northside will get an IKEA? Just a thought....while we're talking retail tourist attractions.
  • LadySales, you can bet your bottom dollar that if an IKEA does ever come to Indy, it will be on the Northside.
  • Did Gander Mountain STIF Cabela's?

    http://nwitimes.com/articles/2006/01/07/news/top_news/27d0022da099424c862570ef0000d706.txt
  • Sophia, IKEA likes less than obvious places for their locations. So, what do you think - Noblesville? Especially after this whole Hamilton Town Center.
  • IKEA IKEA IKEA
    I vote for IKEA!
  • LadySales, someplace off of I69 would be a perfect location for an IKEA or maybe even off of I65 in the new Anson development in Lebanon. An urban IKEA in downtown would be wonderful, but our city leaders are too stupid to ever let that become a reality.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT